Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Processing the Loblolly Pine PtGen2 cDNA Microarray
Published on: March 20, 2009
Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce
Jean Beaulieu1, Trevor K Doerksen, John MacKay
1Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, 1055 du P,E,P,S, Stn, Sainte-Foy, P,O, Box 10380, Quebec City, QC G1V 4C7, Canada. Jean.Beaulieu@NRCan.gc.ca.
Genomic selection in white spruce shows high prediction accuracy for wood traits within breeding populations, but requires careful consideration of relatedness and environments for growth traits. Building models within populations is recommended for reliable genomic prediction.
Area of Science:
- Forest genetics
- Quantitative genetics
- Tree breeding
Background:
- Genomic selection (GS) offers potential advantages over conventional pedigree-based selection in tree species.
- Investigating GS effectiveness requires understanding marker information versus pedigree data in recently domesticated species.
- White spruce (Picea glauca) serves as a model for evaluating GS in tree breeding.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine genomic prediction accuracies for growth and wood traits in white spruce.
- To compare GS performance within and between environments and breeding groups (BG).
- To assess the impact of marker density and relatedness on prediction accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 1748 trees and 6932 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for genomic prediction.
- Employed ridge regression (RR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models.
- Conducted cross-validation (CV) within and between environments and BGs, with and without relatedness.
Main Results:
- RR and LASSO models achieved prediction accuracies comparable to pedigree-based models.
- High prediction accuracies (r = 0.71-0.79 for wood, r = 0.52-0.69 for growth) were observed within environments and BGs with strong relatedness.
- Prediction accuracies decreased significantly when predicting into untested environments or between unrelated BGs.
- Marker subsets yielded similar patterns but with reduced accuracy compared to the full marker set.
Conclusions:
- High relatedness within breeding populations is crucial for accurate genomic prediction.
- GS models are recommended for use within the same breeding population, with merged BGs acceptable if effective population size (Ne) < 50.
- A few hundred markers are sufficient for accurate GS, but accuracy may decline over generations.
- Vegetative propagation of superior individuals within large families is a promising short-term GS strategy for multiclonal forestry.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Gene-Environment Interactions
Genetics of Speciation
Frequency-dependent Selection
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...

