Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Changing outcomes after heart transplantation in patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy
Margot K Davis1, Peter H U Lee2, Ronald M Witteles1
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Stanford Amyloid Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Insights
Heart transplants for amyloid cardiomyopathy (ACM) historically had poor outcomes. Modern era heart transplant (HT) survival for ACM patients is improving, approaching that of other diagnoses.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Medical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Amyloid cardiomyopathy (ACM) is linked to poor prognosis and historically unfavorable outcomes after heart transplant (HT).
- Previous studies indicated lower survival rates for ACM patients post-HT compared to other heart transplant recipients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare heart transplant (HT) outcomes for amyloid cardiomyopathy (ACM) patients in the modern era (2008-2013) versus a historical era (1987-2007).
- To assess changes in survival rates and patient demographics for ACM patients undergoing HT over time.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry.
- Compared outcomes of 188 ACM patients undergoing primary single-organ HT between two eras: Era 1 (1987-2007) and Era 2 (2008-2013).
- Analyzed adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for post-HT mortality in ACM patients versus other etiologies of restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) and all other diagnoses.
Main Results:
- ACM patients in Era 2 were older, had higher BMI, longer ischemic times, and were more likely to be African-American, UNOS Status 1A, male, and highly sensitized compared to Era 1.
- While ACM patients had higher mortality risk in Era 1 (HR 2.08 vs RCM), this difference diminished significantly in Era 2 (HR 1.22).
- Post-HT mortality for ACM patients was significantly lower in Era 2 compared to Era 1 (HR 0.49), indicating improved outcomes over time.
Conclusions:
- Post-HT outcomes for ACM patients in the modern era have improved, nearing those of non-ACM patients.
- Demographic shifts, possibly including increased identification of transthyretin ACM, may contribute to improved selection and outcomes.
- Heart transplantation (HT) should be considered for suitable ACM candidates due to evolving favorable outcomes.
Background:
Amyloid cardiomyopathy (ACM) is associated with a poor prognosis. Previous reports have suggested unfavorable post-heart transplant (HT) survival in this population compared with other HT recipients.
Methods:
Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry were used to study outcomes among ACM patients undergoing HT in the modern era (Era 2, 2008 to 2013) as compared with the historical era (Era 1, 1987 to 2007).
Results:
One hundred eighty-eight ACM patients underwent primary single-organ HT. Ninety-seven patients (51.6%) were transplanted in Era 1 and 91 (48.4%) in Era 2. ACM patients undergoing HT in Era 2 were older (p < 0.0001), had higher body mass index (p = 0.008) and longer ischemic times (p = 0.02), and were more likely to be African-American (p < 0.0001), UNOS Status 1A (p < 0.0001), male (p = 0.01) and highly sensitized (p < 0.0001) compared with those in Era 1. Compared with patients with other etiologies of restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM; n = 339 in Era 1, n = 164 in Era 2), adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for post-HT mortality of ACM were 2.08 (p < 0.0001) in Era 1 and 1.22 (p = not statistically significant) in Era 2. Adjusted HRs for mortality of ACM vs all other diagnoses (n = 36,334 in Era 1, n = 9,225 in Era 2) were 1.84 (p < 0.0001) in Era 1 and 1.38 (p = NS) in Era 2. Although post-HT survival did not change with time among non-ACM RCM patients, post-HT mortality was lower in Era 2 compared with Era 1 among ACM patients (HR 0.49, p = 0.03).
Conclusions:
Although historically associated with inferior survival, post-HT outcomes in ACM patients in the modern era are now approaching those of non-ACM patients. Changes in patients' demographics suggest that this may be related to improved patient selection, including an increased proportion of patients with transthyretin ACM. HT should be considered for appropriate candidates with ACM.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

