Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

504
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
504
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.4K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.4K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

711
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
711
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.2K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.2K
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

712
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
712
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alirocumab plus cemiplimab in advanced immuno-refractory metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: an ongoing multi-center phase II study.

Future oncology (London, England)·2026
Same author

Novel niclosamide stearate prodrug therapeutic shows potential efficacy against naturally occurring canine osteosarcoma in a clinical feasibility study.

American journal of veterinary research·2025
Same author

Design and analysis of individually randomized group-treatment trials with time to event outcomes.

Lifetime data analysis·2025
Same author

Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: A phase I safety & feasibility trial.

Brain stimulation·2025
Same author

Randomized Phase II Cancer Clinical Trials to Validate Predictive Biomarkers.

Biomedicines·2024
Same author

A Dunnett-Type Test and Its Sample Size Calculation for Comparing <i>K</i> ROC Curves with a Control.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same journal

Widening Health Inequality and Causal Metabolic Drivers in Global Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-Dimensional Study.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

GFAP-Dependent Transcriptional Dynamics and Cellular Heterogeneity in Primary, Recurrent, and Grade III Gliomas.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

Translating Data Into Clinical Tools: An Integrative Strategy for Precision Biomarker Identification in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

The MAPK Pathway Coordinates an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Cell Guided Prognostic Model.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

Multi-Scale Cross-Attention Multiple Instance Learning Network for Automated Classification of Colorectal Polyps.

Cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

LEPR Contributes to Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Insights From Mendelian Randomization and Experimental Studies.

Cancer informatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.2K

Type I error control for tree classification.

Sin-Ho Jung1, Yong Chen2, Hongshik Ahn2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Cancer Informatics
|December 3, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new binary tree classification method to manage the high risk of Type I errors. The proposed approach controls the probability of incorrectly accepting a predictor, aiming for a 5% acceptance rate.

Keywords:
binary treeclassificationpermutationsingle-step procedurestep-down proceduretype I error

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis
06:56

Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis

Published on: September 22, 2023

1.9K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.2K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis
06:56

Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis

Published on: September 22, 2023

1.9K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Machine Learning
  • Data Mining

Background:

  • Binary tree classification is widely used for population segmentation based on outcome variables and predictors.
  • The method is prone to Type I errors due to numerous candidate predictors and cutoff values.
  • Existing literature inadequately addresses the multiplicity issue in binary tree classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel binary tree classification method.
  • To control the probability of Type I errors in predictor selection.
  • To establish a maximum acceptable probability (e.g., 5%) for accepting a predictor.

Main Methods:

  • Developing a modified binary tree classification algorithm.
  • Implementing a statistical procedure to adjust for multiple testing.
  • Simulating performance under various data conditions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively controls the Type I error rate.
  • Performance evaluation demonstrates reduced false positive rates compared to standard methods.
  • The method maintains reasonable classification accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The new binary tree classification technique offers a robust solution for managing Type I errors.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of predictor selection in complex datasets.
  • Further research can explore extensions to other classification algorithms.