Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optical myopia control interventions: Evaluation of methods and success in a real-world population.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same author

The prevalence and costs of optical correction for childhood myopia in Scotland.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2025
Same author

Impact of myopia management university-based learning on self-reported clinical practice.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2025
Same author

Absolute Risks and Decision Tools for Communicating the Risks of Visual Impairment From Myopia-Related Diseases.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025
Same author

Perceptions and Barriers to Accessing Myopia Management in the UK.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Erratum: Leptonic Decay of the ϒ(1S) Meson at Third Order in QCD [Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 151801 (2014)].

Physical review letters·2025
Same journal

Impact of crowding on visual appearance and performance in amblyopia.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
08:27

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Published on: March 3, 2023

1.6K

Quantifying interactions between accommodation and vergence in a binocularly normal population.

Laura E Sweeney1, Dirk Seidel, Mhairi Day

  • 1Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, Scotland G4 0BA, United Kingdom. Laura.Sweeney@gcu.ac.uk

Vision Research
|December 3, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study quantifies accommodative vergence (AC/A) and vergence accommodation (CA/C) ratios in visually normal individuals. It found strong agreement between stimulus and response AC/A ratios, but poorer agreement for CA/C ratios, highlighting measurement challenges.

More Related Videos

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.5K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

5.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
08:27

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Published on: March 3, 2023

1.6K
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.5K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

5.1K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology and Vision Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Physiology

Background:

  • The accommodation and vergence systems interact via cross-link mechanisms.
  • Accommodative vergence (AC/A) and vergence accommodation (CA/C) ratios quantify these interactions.
  • Clinical measurement of stimulus AC/A is common, but stimulus CA/C measurement is rare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify both stimulus and response AC/A and CA/C ratios in a binocularly normal population.
  • To determine the relationship between stimulus and response AC/A and CA/C ratios.
  • To assess the agreement between stimulus and response measurements for both ratios.

Main Methods:

  • Recruited 25 university students (mean age 21.0 ± 1.9 years) with normal binocular vision.
  • Measured stimulus and response AC/A and CA/C ratios.
  • Analyzed the linear relationship and agreement between stimulus and response ratios.

Main Results:

  • A significant linear relationship was found between stimulus and response AC/A ratios (r² = 0.96, p < 0.001).
  • Good agreement was observed between stimulus and response AC/A ratios (95% CI -0.06 to 0.24 MA/D).
  • Stimulus and response CA/C ratios were linearly related, but agreement was poorer (95% CI -0.46 to 0.42 D/MA) due to vergence response variability.

Conclusions:

  • Stimulus and response AC/A ratios are highly correlated and show good agreement in normal individuals.
  • Stimulus and response CA/C ratios are linearly related but exhibit greater variability and poorer agreement.
  • Further research is needed to refine CA/C ratio measurement methodologies.