Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
Aggressive risk factor reduction study for atrial fibrillation and implications for the outcome of ablation: the
Rajeev K Pathak1, Melissa E Middeldorp1, Dennis H Lau1
1Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Insights
Aggressive risk factor management (RFM) significantly improved long-term atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation success. Addressing cardiovascular risk factors is crucial for effective rhythm control strategies in AF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Long-term outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation show a decline.
- This attrition may stem from unaddressed cardiovascular risk factors that promote AF progression.
- Optimizing AF ablation success requires managing the underlying substrate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of risk factor management (RFM) and weight loss on AF ablation outcomes.
- To determine if comprehensive RFM enhances long-term success after AF ablation.
- To evaluate the role of lifestyle modifications in improving AF management.
Main Methods:
- 281 patients undergoing AF ablation were studied.
- 149 patients with obesity (BMI ≥27 kg/m²) and ≥1 cardiac risk factor were offered RFM.
- 61 RFM patients and 88 controls were followed for 3-6 months with clinical assessments and Holter monitoring.
Main Results:
- RFM group showed greater improvements in weight, blood pressure, glycemic control, and lipid profiles.
- AF frequency, duration, and symptom severity significantly decreased in the RFM group.
- Single and multiple-procedure arrhythmia-free survival was substantially higher in the RFM group (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Aggressive RFM significantly enhances long-term success rates of AF ablation.
- Targeting primary promoters of the AF substrate is essential for effective rhythm control.
- Integrating RFM into AF treatment strategies improves patient outcomes.
Background:
The long-term outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation demonstrates attrition. This outcome may be due to failure to attenuate the progressive substrate promoted by cardiovascular risk factors.
Objectives:
The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of risk factor and weight management on AF ablation outcomes.
Methods:
Of 281 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation, 149 with a body mass index ≥27 kg/m(2) and ≥1 cardiac risk factor were offered risk factor management (RFM) according to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines. After AF ablation, all 61 patients who opted for RFM and 88 control subjects were assessed every 3 to 6 months by clinic review and 7-day Holter monitoring. Changes in the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale scores were determined.
Results:
There were no differences in baseline characteristics, number of procedures, or follow-up duration between the groups (p = NS). RFM resulted in greater reductions in weight (p = 0.002) and blood pressure (p = 0.006), and better glycemic control (p = 0.001) and lipid profiles (p = 0.01). At follow-up, AF frequency, duration, symptoms, and symptom severity decreased more in the RFM group compared with the control group (all p < 0.001). Single-procedure drug-unassisted arrhythmia-free survival was greater in RFM patients compared with control subjects (p < 0.001). Multiple-procedure arrhythmia-free survival was markedly better in RFM patients compared with control subjects (p < 0.001), with 16% and 42.4%, respectively, using antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, type of AF (p < 0.001) and RFM (hazard ratio 4.8 [95% confidence interval: 2.04 to 11.4]; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of arrhythmia-free survival.
Conclusions:
Aggressive RFM improved the long-term success of AF ablation. This study underscores the importance of therapy directed at the primary promoters of the AF substrate to facilitate rhythm control strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

