Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Coat Assembly and GTPases01:33

Coat Assembly and GTPases

4.8K
Vesicles incorporate different coat protein subunits in different cell locations, which changes the properties of the coat, such as the shape and geometry of the transport vesicles. Thus, vesicle coat proteins also play a significant role in cargo selection.
Coat assembly depends on the local availability of phosphatidylinositol phosphates or PIPs and GTP-binding proteins. Adaptor proteins, which link the coat proteins to the membrane, bind to these PIPs and play a crucial role in controlling...
4.8K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.3K
Tail-anchoring of Proteins in the ER Membrane01:45

Tail-anchoring of Proteins in the ER Membrane

4.1K
Tail-anchored, or TA, proteins are estimated to make up to 3-5% of membrane proteins found in the eukaryotic cell. Such proteins have a single transmembrane domain located approximately 30 amino acid residues upstream from the C-terminal end. As a result, the signal recognition particle (SRP) cannot guide a TA protein to the ER membrane for cotranslational insertion. Hence, they are integrated into the ER membrane post-translationally using their C-terminal end as the anchor. TA proteins...
4.1K
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts01:57

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts

3.1K
Groups of proteins may form a complex where each protein in this complex has a different role in the overall execution of the complex’s function. Often some of the proteins in the complex can be replaced by a closely related variant to give a complex that contains many of the same components yet is functionally distinct.
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order...
3.1K
General Transcription Factors01:30

General Transcription Factors

7.8K
Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
7.8K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.6K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cell surface localisation of GPI-anchored receptors in <i>Trypanosoma brucei</i>.

eLife·2026
Same author

The thyrotropin receptor structure and interactions with autoantibodies.

European thyroid journal·2025
Same author

Hammerhead ribozymes directed against mRNA of an essential gene inhibit <i>Escherichia coli</i> growth and enhance tetracycline efficacy.

Frontiers in microbiology·2025
Same author

Correction: Proximity-induced SuFEx increases the potency of cytosolic nucleotidase inhibitors and reveals a rare example of covalently targeted histidine.

RSC chemical biology·2025
Same author

Proximity-induced SuFEx increases the potency of cytosolic nucleotidase inhibitors and reveals a rare example of covalently targeted histidine.

RSC chemical biology·2025
Same author

Trinucleotide cap analogs with triphosphate chain modifications: synthesis, properties, and evaluation as mRNA capping reagents.

Nucleic acids research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Analysis of Cap-binding Proteins in Human Cells Exposed to Physiological Oxygen Conditions
10:40

Analysis of Cap-binding Proteins in Human Cells Exposed to Physiological Oxygen Conditions

Published on: December 28, 2016

8.4K

Distinct features of cap binding by eIF4E1b proteins.

Dorota Kubacka1, Ricardo Núñez Miguel2, Nicola Minshall2

  • 1Division of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw 02-089, Poland.

Journal of Molecular Biology
|December 3, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The study reveals that eIF4E1b, a cap-binding protein, binds less effectively to mRNA caps than its counterpart eIF4E1a. Specific amino acid differences in eIF4E1b modulate its cap-binding properties.

Keywords:
Xenopus laevisbinding affinityeIF4E1beukaryotic initiation factortranslational repression

More Related Videos

Monitoring eIF4F Assembly by Measuring eIF4E-eIF4G Interaction in Live Cells
08:47

Monitoring eIF4F Assembly by Measuring eIF4E-eIF4G Interaction in Live Cells

Published on: May 1, 2020

3.4K
Identification of Protein Interacting Partners Using Tandem Affinity Purification
10:02

Identification of Protein Interacting Partners Using Tandem Affinity Purification

Published on: February 25, 2012

38.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Analysis of Cap-binding Proteins in Human Cells Exposed to Physiological Oxygen Conditions
10:40

Analysis of Cap-binding Proteins in Human Cells Exposed to Physiological Oxygen Conditions

Published on: December 28, 2016

8.4K
Monitoring eIF4F Assembly by Measuring eIF4E-eIF4G Interaction in Live Cells
08:47

Monitoring eIF4F Assembly by Measuring eIF4E-eIF4G Interaction in Live Cells

Published on: May 1, 2020

3.4K
Identification of Protein Interacting Partners Using Tandem Affinity Purification
10:02

Identification of Protein Interacting Partners Using Tandem Affinity Purification

Published on: February 25, 2012

38.4K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • RNA Biology
  • Protein Structure and Function

Background:

  • eIF4E1b is a cap-binding protein highly expressed in oocytes, related to eIF4E1a.
  • eIF4E1b is part of the CPEB mRNP translation repressor complex.
  • Previous studies showed eIF4E1b has weak cap interactions and binds 4E-T instead of eIF4G.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the cap analogue interactions of Xenopus and human eIF4E1b.
  • To compare the cap-binding abilities of eIF4E1b and eIF4E1a.
  • To investigate the structural basis for differences in cap binding.

Main Methods:

  • Fluorescence titration to study protein-cap analogue interactions.
  • Homology modeling to predict protein structure.
  • Site-directed mutagenesis to assess amino acid function.

Main Results:

  • eIF4E1b exhibits a 3-fold weaker cap-binding affinity than eIF4E1a.
  • Both proteins are stimulated by N(7)-methylation of guanine.
  • eIF4E1b shows distinct binding characteristics, including enhanced binding with a benzyl group and altered responses to phosphate chain length and linker-bound caps.
  • Mutagenesis of differentiating amino acids in eIF4E1a reduced its cap binding by 2-fold.

Conclusions:

  • eIF4E1b possesses unique cap-binding properties distinct from eIF4E1a due to conserved amino acid substitutions.
  • These substitutions near the cap-binding pocket modulate cap affinity and binding characteristics.
  • The findings highlight structural variations influencing mRNA cap recognition in translation initiation factors.