Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Goal-directed fluid therapy in major elective rectal surgery.
Sanket Srinivasa1, Matthew H G Taylor2, Primal P Singh1
1Department of Surgery, South Auckland Clinical School, Middlemore Hospital, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) did not reduce complications or hospital stay in major rectal surgery. This study found no significant clinical benefits for patients undergoing elective rectal procedures with GDFT.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Surgical Outcomes Research
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) is established for major colorectal surgery but lacks specific data for rectal surgery.
- Previous studies suggest GDFT may reduce complications and hospital length of stay.
- The applicability and efficacy of GDFT in modern rectal surgery require investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical benefits of GDFT in patients undergoing major elective rectal surgery.
- To determine if GDFT impacts 30-day total complications and hospital length of stay.
- To compare fluid administration volumes between GDFT and conventional fluid management.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of 81 patients undergoing major elective rectal surgery.
- Twenty-seven patients received GDFT using Oesophageal Doppler Monitor (ODM); 54 patients served as a historical control group.
- Primary endpoint: 30-day total complications; Secondary endpoints: hospital length of stay (LOS) and fluid volumes.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in total complications (81% vs. 81%) or median hospital LOS (9 vs. 10 days) between groups.
- GDFT group received higher initial colloid boluses (1000 mL vs. 500 mL) but similar intraoperative total fluid volumes (3000 mL vs. 3000 mL).
- A non-significant trend suggested decreased 24-hour fluid requirement in the GDFT group (p=0.06).
Conclusions:
- Intraoperative GDFT did not demonstrate significant improvements in clinical outcomes for major elective rectal surgery.
- The study did not find GDFT to be superior to conventional fluid management in this specific patient population.
- Further research may be needed to explore potential benefits of GDFT in specific subgroups or with different protocols.
More Related Videos
04:05Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy
Published on: August 22, 2025
06:00Laparoscopic Anatomic S7+S8d Resection Preserving Inferior Right Hepatic Vein and S6 with Right Hepatic Vein Transection
Published on: December 30, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management