Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

07:15
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
Published on: December 18, 2020
5.2K
Measuring errors and violations on the road: a bifactor modeling approach to the Driver Behavior Questionnaire.
Richard Rowe1, Gabriela D Roman2, Frank P McKenna3
1University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|December 3, 2014
Summary
This study reveals that a general driver behavior factor and ordinary violations predict crashes in novice drivers. A shorter 12-item Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) effectively captures these driving behavior aspects.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Transportation Safety
- Road User Behavior
Background:
- The Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) is a validated self-report measure for assessing driving behaviors.
- Existing research highlights the need to clarify the relationships between DBQ sub-components (violations, errors) and crash involvement.
- The efficacy of a condensed DBQ version requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the factor structure of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) using a bifactor model.
- To determine the predictive validity of DBQ components and a general factor for crash involvement in novice drivers.
- To assess the effectiveness of a reduced-item DBQ.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a bifactor modeling approach on data from the UK Cohort II longitudinal study of 12,012 novice drivers.
- Collected DBQ data at multiple time points (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 years post-test).
- Compared bifactor models with correlated and second-order factor structures; tested a 12-item reduced model.
Main Results:
- A bifactor model with a general factor and specific factors (ordinary violations, aggressive violations, slips, errors) provided the best fit.
- A 12-item DBQ model successfully replicated the full model's structure and yielded highly correlated factor scores.
- The general factor and ordinary violations independently predicted crash involvement at 6 months post-independent driving.
Conclusions:
- The bifactor model effectively captures the structure of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ).
- A condensed 12-item DBQ is a viable and effective tool for assessing driving behavior.
- Both general driving behavior tendencies and specific ordinary violations are crucial predictors of novice driver crash risk.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
1.0K
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
1.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
8.5K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
8.5K
Response Surface Methodology
894
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
894
Random and Systematic Errors
16.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.3K
Random and Systematic Errors
968
968
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient
1.8K
The extended Debye-Hückel equation indicates that the activity coefficient of an ion in an aqueous solution at 25°C depends on three partially interdependent properties: the ionic strength of the solution, the charge of the ion, and the ion size.
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...
1.8K

