Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Metallic Solids02:37

Metallic Solids

21.6K
Metallic solids such as crystals of copper, aluminum, and iron are formed by metal atoms. The structure of metallic crystals is often described as a uniform distribution of atomic nuclei within a “sea” of delocalized electrons. The atoms within such a metallic solid are held together by a unique force known as metallic bonding that gives rise to many useful and varied bulk properties.
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and...
21.6K
Properties of Transition Metals02:58

Properties of Transition Metals

31.3K
Transition metals are defined as those elements that have partially filled d orbitals. As shown in Figure 1, the d-block elements in groups 3–12 are transition elements. The f-block elements, also called inner transition metals (the lanthanides and actinides), also meet this criterion because the d orbital is partially occupied before the f orbitals.
31.3K
Bonding in Metals02:32

Bonding in Metals

57.7K
Metallic bonds are formed between two metal atoms. A simplified model to describe metallic bonding has been developed by Paul Drüde called the “Electron Sea Model”. 
57.7K
Types of Chemical Bonds02:37

Types of Chemical Bonds

97.6K
Chemical bonding theories were pioneered by American chemist Gilbert N. Lewis. He developed a model called the Lewis model to explain the type and formation of different bonds. Chemical bonding is central to chemistry; it explains how atoms or ions bond together to form molecules. It explains why some bonds are strong and others are weak, or why one carbon bonds with two oxygens and not three; why water is H2O and not H4O. 
97.6K
Molecular and Ionic Solids02:54

Molecular and Ionic Solids

21.1K
Crystalline solids are divided into four types: molecular, ionic, metallic, and covalent network based on the type of constituent units and their interparticle interactions.
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
21.1K
Properties of Organometallic Compounds01:23

Properties of Organometallic Compounds

2.2K
Organometallic compounds are compounds that contain a carbon–metal bond. Carbon belongs to an organyl group like alkyl, aryl, allyl, or benzyl groups. The metal can be from Group I or Group II of the periodic table, a transition metal, or a semimetal.
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insights into the Structure of Ultrasmall Fluorescent Core-Shell Silica Nanoparticles.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Understanding the Structural Origin of Chirality in Magic-Size Semiconductor Nanoclusters through Self-Assembly Simulations.

Nano letters·2025
Same author

Kinetic pathways of solid-solid phase transitions dictated by short-range interactions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

A coarse-grained simulation toolkit for metal-organic framework synthesis.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2025
Same author

Hierarchical Self-Assembly of Magnetic Handshake Materials.

ACS nano·2025
Same author

The emergence of bulk structure in clusters <i>via</i> isotropic multi-well pair potentials.

Soft matter·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

9.1K

Some statistics on intermetallic compounds.

Julia Dshemuchadse1, Walter Steurer

  • 1Laboratory of Crystallography, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland.

Inorganic Chemistry
|December 4, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores the vast diversity of intermetallic crystal structures. It analyzes symmetries, sizes, and stability of over 20,000 structures, focusing on binary compounds.

More Related Videos

Metal-silicate Partitioning at High Pressure and Temperature: Experimental Methods and a Protocol to Suppress Highly Siderophile Element Inclusions
11:50

Metal-silicate Partitioning at High Pressure and Temperature: Experimental Methods and a Protocol to Suppress Highly Siderophile Element Inclusions

Published on: June 13, 2015

13.0K
Demonstrating the Simplicity and In Situ Temperature Monitoring of the Mechanochemical Synthesis of Metal Chalcogenides Suitable for Thermoelectrics
04:09

Demonstrating the Simplicity and In Situ Temperature Monitoring of the Mechanochemical Synthesis of Metal Chalcogenides Suitable for Thermoelectrics

Published on: August 30, 2024

975

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

9.1K
Metal-silicate Partitioning at High Pressure and Temperature: Experimental Methods and a Protocol to Suppress Highly Siderophile Element Inclusions
11:50

Metal-silicate Partitioning at High Pressure and Temperature: Experimental Methods and a Protocol to Suppress Highly Siderophile Element Inclusions

Published on: June 13, 2015

13.0K
Demonstrating the Simplicity and In Situ Temperature Monitoring of the Mechanochemical Synthesis of Metal Chalcogenides Suitable for Thermoelectrics
04:09

Demonstrating the Simplicity and In Situ Temperature Monitoring of the Mechanochemical Synthesis of Metal Chalcogenides Suitable for Thermoelectrics

Published on: August 30, 2024

975

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Crystallography
  • Solid-State Chemistry

Background:

  • Intermetallic phases exhibit a wide range of crystal structures and unit cell sizes, from 1 to over 20,000 atoms.
  • The underlying reasons for this structural diversity remain largely unexplained.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of intermetallic crystal structures.
  • To analyze symmetries, unit cell sizes, stoichiometries, common structure types, and stability fields.
  • To investigate the relationship between these properties and Mendeleev numbers as ordering parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a dataset comprising 20,829 intermetallic structures across 2,166 structure types.
  • Focused investigation on a subset of 6,441 binary intermetallic compounds representing 943 structure types.
  • Utilized Mendeleev numbers as ordering parameters to explore structure-property relationships.

Main Results:

  • Characterization of the distribution of symmetries, unit cell sizes, and stoichiometries in intermetallic compounds.
  • Identification of the most frequent structure types and their prevalence.
  • Mapping of stability fields for various intermetallic phases based on Mendeleev numbers.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a foundational dataset and analysis for understanding the factors governing intermetallic crystal structure diversity.
  • Mendeleev numbers serve as a useful parameter for organizing and predicting intermetallic phase behavior.
  • Further research can build upon this overview to delve into the specific mechanisms driving observed structural trends.