Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Predictors and prevention of flow insufficiency due to limited flow demand
Hiroyuki Nakajima1, Atsushi Iguchi2, Mimiko Tabata3
1The Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan. hn00504@ybb.ne.jp.
Insights
Graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting is linked to competitive flow and inadequate demand. Distal lesions require more severe stenosis than proximal ones to prevent failure, necessitating distinct revascularization strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Investigated the impact of flow demand and native coronary stenosis on bypass graft flow and patency.
- Examined graft performance in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the relationship between native coronary stenosis severity and bypass graft flow insufficiency.
- To identify predictors of graft flow insufficiency and failure in CABG patients.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed angiograms of 549 bypass grafts in 301 patients who underwent off-pump CABG.
- Defined flow insufficiency (≤20 ml/min) and identified cut-off minimal luminal diameter (MLD) for proximal and distal lesions.
- Utilized univariate and multivariate analysis to identify significant predictors of flow insufficiency.
Main Results:
- Flow insufficiency occurred in 20.4% of bypass grafts.
- Distal lesions (OR: 3.12) and MLD greater than cut-off (OR: 3.64) were significant predictors of flow insufficiency.
- Grafting to the right coronary artery (OR: 18.2) and left circumflex artery (OR: 2.29) also predicted insufficiency.
Conclusions:
- Both competitive flow and insufficient flow demand contribute to bypass graft failure.
- Distal lesions necessitate more severe stenosis compared to proximal lesions to prevent graft failure.
- Revascularization strategies for distal lesions should be considered separately from those for proximal lesions.
Background:
We investigated the impacts of flow demand and native coronary stenosis on graft flow and patency.
Methods:
We reviewed the angiograms of 549 bypass grafts in 301 patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting since 2007. Grafts consisted of 237 internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery; 97 internal thoracic artery and 52 saphenous vein grafts to left circumflex artery; and 109 gastroepiploic artery and 54 saphenous vein grafts to right coronary artery. We selected only individual bypass grafts created as the sole bypass graft to the coronary vascular region. Flow insufficiency was defined as ≤ 20 ml/min measured intraoperatively. When a significant difference in the incidence of flow insufficiency or "not functional" occurred between higher and lower values rather than the particular minimal luminal diameter value, the highest value was defined as the cut-off minimal luminal diameter. Distal lesions were defined as stenosis at segment #4, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, or 15.
Results:
Flow insufficiency was found in 112/549 (20.4%) bypass grafts. For internal thoracic artery to left circumflex artery grafts, the cut-off minimal luminal diameter for proximal and distal lesions was 1.25 mm and 0.75 mm, respectively. For gastroepiploic artery to right coronary artery grafts, the cut-off minimal luminal diameter was 0.82 mm for proximal lesions (p = 0.005), while 10 (71%) of 14 gastroepiploic artery grafts for distal lesions presented with flow insufficiency. Univariate and multivariate analysis identified a distal lesion (odds ratio (OR): 3.12, p < 0.0001); minimal luminal diameter greater than the cut-off value (OR: 3.64, p < 0.0001); right coronary artery (OR: 18.2, p = 0.0002) and left circumflex artery (OR; 2.29, p = 0.009) grafting; and a history of myocardial infarction in the grafted region (OR: 2.21, p = 0.02) as significant predictors of flow insufficiency.
Conclusions:
Both competitive flow and insufficient flow demand cause graft failure. For distal lesions, more severe stenosis is necessary to avoid graft failure, compared with proximal lesions. A revascularization strategy for distal lesions should be discussed separately from that for proximal lesions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Regulation of Stroke Volume
Preload refers to the degree of stretch on the heart before it contracts. It's analogous to the stretching of a rubber band; the more it's stretched, the more forcefully it snaps back. This concept is encapsulated in the Frank-Starling law of the...
Laminar Flow
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

