Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study
Amy C Plint1, Amanda Newton2, Antonia Stang3
1Departments of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
This study estimates the risk and types of adverse events (AEs) in Canadian pediatric emergency departments. It highlights the need for improved patient safety for children in these high-risk settings.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Patient Safety Research
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Adverse events (AEs) pose a significant threat to patient safety and public health.
- Pediatric emergency departments (EDs) are high-risk settings for AEs due to factors like high patient volumes and chaotic environments.
- Children are a vulnerable population, yet research on pediatric patient safety in EDs is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the risk, type, preventability, and severity of AEs in children treated in Canadian pediatric EDs.
- To address the research gap concerning pediatric patient safety within the emergency department setting.
- To provide data for improving safety protocols and reducing harm in pediatric emergency care.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre, prospective cohort study involving 5632 patients under 18 years across nine Canadian pediatric EDs.
- Stratified cluster random sampling to ensure representative patient recruitment.
- A standardized two-stage process for rigorous AE identification, with primary outcome being the proportion of children experiencing AEs within 3 weeks post-ED visit.
Main Results:
- The study aims to detect a 5% proportion of children experiencing AEs with a 0.6% margin of error.
- Secondary outcomes will detail the proportion of preventable AEs and their characteristics (type and severity).
- Results will be disseminated through publications, presentations, and webinars to knowledge users.
Conclusions:
- This research is crucial for understanding and mitigating patient safety risks for children in Canadian pediatric EDs.
- Findings will inform targeted interventions to enhance the safety and quality of care for pediatric patients.
- The study contributes vital evidence to the field of pediatric emergency medicine and patient safety.
Introduction:
Adverse events (AEs), defined as unintended patient harm related to healthcare provided rather than an underlying medical condition, represent a significant threat to patient safety and public health. The emergency department (ED) is a high-risk patient safety setting for many reasons including presentation 'outside of regular hours', high patient volumes, and a chaotic work environment. Children have also been identified as particularly vulnerable to AEs. Despite the identification of the ED as a high-risk setting and the vulnerability of the paediatric population, little research has been conducted regarding paediatric patient safety in the ED. The study objective is to generate an estimate of the risk and type of AEs, as well as their preventability and severity, for children seen in Canadian paediatric EDs.
Methods And Analysis:
This multicentre, prospective cohort study will enrol patients under 18 years of age from nine paediatric EDs across Canada. A stratified cluster random sampling scheme will be used to ensure patients recruited are representative of the overall ED population. A rigorous, standardised two-stage process will be used for AE identification. The primary outcome will be the proportion of children with AEs associated with ED care in the 3 weeks following the ED visit. Secondary outcomes will include the proportion of children with preventable AEs and the types and severity of AEs. We will aim to recruit 5632 patients over 1 year and this will allow us to detect a proportion of patients with an AE of 5% (to within an absolute margin of error of 0.6%).
Ethics And Dissemination:
Ethics approval has been obtained from participating sites. Results will be disseminated through presentations, peer review publications, linkages with emergency research network and a webinars for key knowledge user groups.
Trial Registration Number:
This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02162147; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02162147).
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Introduction to Epidemiology

