Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

04:52
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
1.4K
The genetical theory of multilevel selection
1School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
|December 6, 2014
Summary
The theory of multilevel selection (MLS) faces conceptual challenges, particularly with class structures in social groups. A new genetical approach decomposes group traits, revealing limitations in group-level fitness covariance for class-structured populations.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Theoretical ecology
- Population genetics
Background:
- The theory of multilevel selection (MLS) explains adaptation at multiple biological levels.
- Existing MLS frameworks struggle with defining group traits and fitness, especially in populations with complex class structures.
- Applications of MLS are limited in social insects due to their caste, age, and sex differentiation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a genetical theory of multilevel selection (MLS) that resolves conceptual difficulties.
- To address the challenge of class structure within the framework of MLS.
- To clarify the relationship between individual contributions and group-level traits, including reproductive success.
Main Methods:
- Developing a genetical framework for multilevel selection.
- Decomposing group-level traits into individual contributions.
- Analyzing the conditions for meaningful group-level trait-fitness covariance in class-structured populations.
Main Results:
- A genetical approach allows for the decomposition of group traits, even emergent ones, into individual contributions.
- A novel problem is identified: group-level trait-fitness covariance may be impossible in class-structured groups.
- The constituents of a social group belonging to separate classes can prevent meaningful group-level fitness covariance.
Conclusions:
- A genetical theory of MLS offers a more robust framework for understanding selection across different levels.
- The presence of distinct classes within a group fundamentally challenges the group-oriented approach to MLS.
- Future research should consider the implications of class structure for evolutionary dynamics in social organisms.
Keywords:
Price's theoremSimpson's paradoxclass structurecovarianceemergenceevolutionary geneticsgroup selectionnatural selectionreproductive valuesocial evolutionMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
46.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.7K
What is Natural Selection?
133.6K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
133.6K
Genetics of Speciation
23.5K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
23.5K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
66.5K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
66.5K
Limits to Natural Selection
36.3K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
36.3K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
787
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
787

