Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Processing fluency effects: can the content and presentation of participant information sheets influence recruitment
Andrew J Manley1, Tina Lavender2, Debbie M Smith3
1Research Institute for Sport, Physical Activity & Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Objective:
To assess the extent to which the title and font of participant information sheets (PISs) can influence pregnant women's and trainee midwives' perceptions of an antenatal intervention.
Methods:
Pregnant women (n=35) and trainee midwives (n=36) were randomly presented with one of four PISs where the title and font of the PIS had been manipulated to create four experimental conditions (i.e., Double Fluent; Double Awkward; Fluent Title-Awkward Font; Awkward Title-Fluent Font). After reading the PIS, participants rated their perceptions of the intervention (i.e., Attractiveness, Complexity, Expected Risk, Required Effort) using five-point Likert scales.
Results:
A 4×2 factorial multivariate analysis of variance revealed that pregnant women rated the Double Awkward condition as significantly more complex than the Double Fluent (p=.024) and Awkward Title-Fluent Font (p=.021) conditions.
Conclusion:
Font influenced pregnant women's ratings of intervention complexity.
Practice Implications:
Results have implications for ethical recruitment, and in turn, the optimisation of corresponding interventions.
