Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Adaptive randomized phase II design for biomarker threshold selection and independent evaluation
Lindsay A Renfro1, Christina M Coughlin2, Axel M Grothey3
1Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
This study introduces an adaptive phase II trial design to identify and validate predictive biomarkers prospectively. The adaptive design optimizes patient selection for experimental treatments, improving trial efficiency and patient care.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trial Design
- Biostatistics
- Translational Medicine
Background:
- Biomarker validation for patient selection in phase II trials is often incomplete at study initiation.
- Retrospective biomarker analysis can lead to over-enrollment of non-responders, underpowered studies, and suboptimal patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- Propose an adaptive randomized phase II study design for prospective biomarker threshold identification.
- Incorporate early futility stopping, mid-trial accrual adjustments based on biomarker status, and focused final analyses.
Main Methods:
- An interim analysis guides decisions on futility stopping, continuation without a marker, or adaptive accrual/resizing based on a promising biomarker.
- Final efficacy analyses are conducted in the identified target population most likely to benefit.
- Simulation studies assess error rates, power, and sample size efficiency.
Main Results:
- The adaptive design effectively identifies predictive biomarkers and restricts accrual to biomarker-positive patients.
- Error rates (Type I and Type II) are controlled through threshold-based prevalence restriction and optimal interim analysis timing.
Conclusions:
- This adaptive design provides a solution for identifying and validating continuous biomarkers within randomized phase II trials.
- It enhances the precision of identifying patient populations most likely to benefit from experimental therapies.
More Related Videos
09:00High Throughput Sequential ELISA for Validation of Biomarkers of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Published on: October 31, 2012
07:40Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies