Feasibility, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Postprocedure Peritoneal Cytology
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Tubal Cytology of the Fallopian Tube as a Promising Tool for Ovarian Cancer Early Detection
Published on: July 25, 2017
Brandon-Luke L Seagle1, Melissa Dawson1, Robert Samuelson1
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Western Connecticut Health Network, Danbury, CT, USA.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and diagnostic performance of cytopathologic evaluation of postprocedure washings collected after hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer. A total of 92 cases of hysterectomy for malignancy having cytology reports of both pre- and postprocedure washings were retrospectively identified. In all, 98.7% of preprocedure and 99.3% of postprocedure washings (P = 1.00) were satisfactory for cytopathology. Discordance regarding the observation of malignant cells between preprocedure and postprocedure washings was insignificant (P = .267). The sensitivity of postprocedure cytology for detecting malignant cells in cases of positive peritoneal histology was significantly lower than the sensitivity of preprocedure cytology (28.6% vs 57.1%, P = .041), with similar specificities (both 94%). Four patients with endometrial cancer having negative preprocedure peritoneal cytology were discovered to have positive postprocedure cytology. Postprocedure peritoneal cytology is feasible and may benefit patients with early-stage cancer by increasing the detection of microscopic peritoneal metastasis or cancer cell seeding during surgery.
More Related Videos
11:29Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: January 22, 2022
07:20Intraoperative Detection of Subtle Endometriosis: A Novel Paradigm for Detection and Treatment of Pelvic Pain Associated with the Loss of Peritoneal Integrity
Published on: December 21, 2012