Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

07:16
Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
2.1K
Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence
Lu Lin1, Hyo-Won Ahn, Su-Jung Kim
1a Postgraduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
The Angle Orthodontist
|December 10, 2014
Summary
Bone-borne expanders offer superior skeletal changes with fewer side effects in late adolescents compared to tooth-borne expanders. This study highlights the benefits of bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) for orthopedic outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Craniofacial Development
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a common orthodontic treatment for transverse discrepancies.
- Traditional tooth-borne expanders can lead to undesirable dentoalveolar side effects.
- Bone-borne expanders offer a potentially more orthopedic approach to RME.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of bone-borne (C-expander) versus tooth-borne (Hyrax) rapid maxillary expansion (RME).
- To evaluate changes in transverse dimensions, alveolar bone, and tooth angulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
- To assess side effects such as buccal dehiscence in late adolescents.
Main Methods:
- A sample of 28 female late adolescents underwent RME with either a bone-borne (n=15) or tooth-borne (n=13) expander.
- CBCT scans were acquired before (T1) and 3 months after (T2) RME.
- Transverse skeletal and dental changes, alveolar inclination, tooth axis, vertical height, and buccal dehiscence were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Bone-borne expanders achieved greater skeletal expansion compared to tooth-borne expanders, with fewer instances of alveolar bone tipping.
- Tooth-borne expanders resulted in more buccal tipping of alveolar bone and tooth axes.
- Similar dental expansion at the apex level was observed for both expander types in banded teeth; however, the tooth-borne group showed significant buccal dehiscence at the first premolar.
Conclusions:
- Bone-borne expanders provide more significant orthopedic effects in late adolescents undergoing RME.
- Compared to tooth-borne expanders, bone-borne devices are associated with fewer dentoalveolar side effects.
- CBCT analysis is crucial for evaluating the precise skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes of RME.

