Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

A General Method for Evaluating Incubation of Sucrose Craving in Rats
Published on: November 4, 2011
Commentary: Craving diagnostic validity in DSM-5 Substance Use Disorders
Mace Beckson1, Douglas Tucker2
1Dr. Beckson is Health Sciences Clinical Professor, UCLA Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, and Staff Psychiatrist, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA. Dr. Tucker is Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Program in Psychiatry and Law, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA.
The DSM-5
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychiatry
- Psychiatry
- Addiction Medicine
Background:
- The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) introduced a new unidimensional spectrum diagnosis for Substance Use Disorder (SUD).
- This shift impacts forensic policies for criminal defendant diversion, previously based on a distinction between addiction and substance use/misuse/abuse.
- The DSM-5's SUD diagnosis integrates abuse criteria from the DSM-IV, necessitating a re-evaluation of policies aligned with the older biaxial paradigm.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the implications of the DSM-5's Substance Use Disorder (SUD) diagnosis within the forensic context of criminal defendant diversion.
- To assess how the DSM-5's spectrum diagnosis affects eligibility criteria for treatment diversion programs.
- To explore the potential benefits and drawbacks of defining addiction within the DSM-5 SUD framework for forensic applications.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of the DSM-5's SUD diagnostic criteria.
- Review of forensic diversion policies and their historical reliance on DSM-IV concepts.
- Examination of the clinical and forensic implications of the DSM-5's approach to addiction.
Main Results:
- The DSM-5's unidimensional SUD spectrum may require re-evaluation of forensic diversion policies.
- Defining addiction strictly within severe DSM-5 SUD could enhance validity but potentially restrict sensitivity in diversion contexts.
- The DSM-5 acknowledges common usage of 'addiction' for severe problems, but its precise definition within the SUD spectrum needs clarification for forensic use.
Conclusions:
- The DSM-5's Substance Use Disorder diagnosis necessitates a re-examination of forensic diversion policies.
- Balancing diagnostic specificity and sensitivity is crucial for appropriate candidate selection in criminal diversion programs.
- Further research and practical experience are needed to fully understand the real-world implications of DSM-5 SUD diagnoses in forensic and clinical settings.
Related Concept Videos
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Drug Dependence
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
CNS Depressants: Alcohol and Nicotine

