Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Dose calibration of EPIDs for segmented IMRT dosimetry
Shrikant Deshpande1, Aitang Xing, Lois Holloway
1Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Sydney Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia. shrikant.Deshpande@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
This study evaluated amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) dose response for radiation therapy. Nonlinear dose response was observed, mainly due to gain ghosting, and was consistent across devices except for Siemens EPIDs.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Imaging Technology
Background:
- Electronic Portal Imaging Devices (EPIDs) are crucial for verifying radiation therapy delivery.
- Understanding EPID dose response is essential for accurate dosimetry, especially with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).
- Gain ghosting is a known artifact affecting EPID image quality and dose accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the dose response of amorphous silicon (a-Si) EPIDs under various acquisition settings.
- To compare dose linearity for open fields versus segmented IMRT fields across different EPID models.
- To evaluate pixel calibration methods for clinical IMRT dosimetry.
Main Methods:
- Four EPIDs (2 Siemens, 1 Elekta, 1 research) were tested with different acquisition settings.
- Dose response linearity was measured for static open fields and simple segmented IMRT fields.
- Simultaneous measurements with an ionization chamber array (ICA) and EPID were performed.
- Three pixel calibration methods were demonstrated and compared for IMRT fields.
Main Results:
- Nonlinear dose response was observed across EPIDs, primarily attributed to gain ghosting.
- Elekta EPID showed good agreement (within 2.5%) between IMRT and static fields for monitor units (MU) ≥ 2.
- Siemens EPIDs exhibited poor reproducibility for segmented IMRT at low MU (≤ 5).
- Pixel calibration at 20 MU yielded results equivalent to ghosting correction models.
Conclusions:
- The nonlinear dose response of a-Si EPIDs is largely insensitive to acquisition settings and mainly caused by gain ghosting.
- A specific pixel-to-dose calibration method at small MU obviates the need for additional ghosting correction factors.
- Clinical implementation of EPID dosimetry requires careful consideration of device-specific performance, particularly for segmented IMRT.
More Related Videos
07:31Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
10:33Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations