Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Identification of Protein Interaction Partners in Mammalian Cells Using SILAC-immunoprecipitation Quantitative Proteomics
Published on: July 6, 2014
Combining protein ratio p-values as a pragmatic approach to the analysis of multirun iTRAQ experiments
Dana Pascovici1, Xiaomin Song, Peter S Solomon
1Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University , Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Abstract:
iTRAQ labeling of peptides is widely used for quantitative comparison of biological samples using mass spectrometry. However, iTRAQ determined protein ratios have varying credibility depending on the number and quality of the peptide ratios used to generate them, and accounting for this becomes problematic particularly in the multirun scenario needed for larger scale biological studies. One approach to this problem relies on the use of sophisticated statistical global models using peptide ratios rather than working directly with the protein ratios, but these yield complex models whose solution relies on computational approaches such as stage-wise regression, which are nontrivial to run and verify. Here we evaluate an alternative pragmatic approach to finding differentially expressed proteins based on combining protein ratio p-values across experiments in a fashion similar to running a meta-analysis across different iTRAQ runs. Our approach uses the well-established Stouffer's Z-transform for combining p-values, alongside a ratio trend consistency measure, which we introduce. We evaluate this method with data from two iTRAQ experiments using plant and animal models. We show that in the specific context of iTRAQ data analysis this method has advantages of simplicity, high tolerance of run variability, low false discovery rate, and emphasis on proteins identified with high confidence.
Related Concept Videos
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

