Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

Survival Tree

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Continuous foraging behavior shapes patch-leaving decisions in pigeons: a 3D tracking study.

Animal cognition·2026

Same author

Motivation, attention, and uncertainty: insights from animal and human research and implications for addiction.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same author

The effects of reward uncertainty and alcohol intoxication on human sign- and goal-tracking.

Psychopharmacology·2026

Same author

Unconscious will as a neurobehavioral mechanism against adversity.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2024

Same author

Correction: Implementations of sign- and goal-tracking behavior in humans: A scoping review.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024

Same author

Implementations of sign- and goal-tracking behavior in humans: A scoping review.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

Does reward unpredictability reflect risk?

Patrick Anselme¹

¹Département de Psychologie, Cognition et Comportement, Université de Liège, 5 Boulevard du Rectorat (B 32), B4000 Liège, Belgium.

Behavioural Brain Research

|December 16, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Real-life risk involves potential resource loss, not just unpredictable rewards. Current lab studies on decision-making may not accurately reflect true risk-taking behavior due to methodological limitations.

Keywords:

Dopamine Limited resources Opportunity cost Risk Unpredictability

More Related Videos

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Behavioral Economics
Decision Science

Background:

Real-life decisions often involve risk due to potential negative consequences.
Current decision-making models define risk as unpredictable reward absence in laboratory settings.
This definition may be limited as reward omission in experiments often lacks true cost.

Purpose of the Study:

To challenge the prevailing definition of risk in decision-making research.
To propose a more accurate definition of risk that includes potential resource loss.
To highlight the limitations of current experimental methodologies in studying risk-taking.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of decision-making paradigms.
Critique of existing models of risk assessment.
Comparison of laboratory-based risk studies with real-life decision-making scenarios.

Main Results:

Reward omission in many experimental paradigms does not equate to a genuine cost or loss.
True risk involves the unpredictable potential loss of limited resources (energetic, social, financial, etc.).
Current experimental designs may oversimplify or misrepresent the nature of risk-taking.

Conclusions:

Existing experimental approaches to risk-taking may not fully capture its complexity.
A revised understanding of risk, incorporating resource cost, is necessary for accurate neurobehavioural studies.
Implications for understanding decision-making in real-world contexts are significant.