Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Characteristics and Nomenclature of Copolymers01:24

Characteristics and Nomenclature of Copolymers

3.6K
Copolymers are the products obtained from the polymerization of multiple monomer species. So, in a polymer chain itself, there can be multiple repeating units that come from different monomers. The process of synthesizing a polymer from different monomer species is called copolymerization. When two monomers are involved, the polymer is known as a bipolymer. Polymers with three and four monomers are termed terpolymers and quaterpolymers, respectively. Figure 1 depicts the copolymerization of...
3.6K
Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution01:10

Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution

5.3K
For any given polymer, the weight average molecular weight (Mw) is higher than, if not equal to, the number average molecular weight (Mn). The only situation in which the weight average molecular weight and the number average molecular weight are equal is when a polymer consists only of chains with equal molecular weight. However, this never happens in a synthetic polymer, since it is difficult to control the polymerization process up to a molecular level with accuracy to a hundred percent.
5.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phase behavior, self-assembly, and interfacial tension of a dynamically linked polymer blend.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Processing-Driven Control of the Properties of Polymer Grafted Nanoparticle Composites.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Entropic and Enthalpic Control of Interfacial Nanoparticle Jamming in Immiscible Polymers.

ACS macro letters·2026
Same author

Motility-Induced Phase Separation Is Maxwell-like Fluid with an Extended and Nonmonotonic Crossover.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Oil-sealed RGD-modified alginate hydrogel microwell array for analysis of single-cell-derived extracellular vesicles and particles.

Microsystems & nanoengineering·2025
Same author

Microphase Separation Controls the Dynamics of Associative Vitrimers.

ACS macro letters·2025
Same journal

Nanopore sequencing with proteins: synchronization and dischronization of molecular dynamics simulations with laboratory and industrial developments.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Catanionics from biosurfactants and regular surfactants: miscibility and structure.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Adhesives with a thickness smaller than the fractocohesive length enhance adhesion.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Non-equilibrium phase transitions in hybrid Voronoi models of cell colonies.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Effects of methoxy substituents on self-assembly and gelation performance of benzamide-based organogelators.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Rheology of <i>Escherichia coli</i> suspensions with various bacterial morphologies and motion characteristics.

Soft matter·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Using Polystyrene-block-polyacrylic acid-coated Metal Nanoparticles as Monomers for Their Homo- and Co-polymerization
09:02

Using Polystyrene-block-polyacrylic acid-coated Metal Nanoparticles as Monomers for Their Homo- and Co-polymerization

Published on: July 9, 2015

13.0K

Quantitative analogy between polymer-grafted nanoparticles and patchy particles.

Makoto Asai1, Angelo Cacciuto, Sanat K Kumar

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, 10027, USA. sk2794@columbia.edu.

Soft Matter
|December 16, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Polymer grafted nanoparticles (PGNPs) quantitatively mimic Janus nanoparticles. Their anisotropic self-assembly arises from simple geometric principles, similar to surfactant models.

More Related Videos

Colloidal Synthesis of Nanopatch Antennas for Applications in Plasmonics and Nanophotonics
09:12

Colloidal Synthesis of Nanopatch Antennas for Applications in Plasmonics and Nanophotonics

Published on: May 28, 2016

11.8K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Self-Assembled MOF-Polymer Composites
06:48

Author Spotlight: Exploring Self-Assembled MOF-Polymer Composites

Published on: June 14, 2024

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Using Polystyrene-block-polyacrylic acid-coated Metal Nanoparticles as Monomers for Their Homo- and Co-polymerization
09:02

Using Polystyrene-block-polyacrylic acid-coated Metal Nanoparticles as Monomers for Their Homo- and Co-polymerization

Published on: July 9, 2015

13.0K
Colloidal Synthesis of Nanopatch Antennas for Applications in Plasmonics and Nanophotonics
09:12

Colloidal Synthesis of Nanopatch Antennas for Applications in Plasmonics and Nanophotonics

Published on: May 28, 2016

11.8K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Self-Assembled MOF-Polymer Composites
06:48

Author Spotlight: Exploring Self-Assembled MOF-Polymer Composites

Published on: June 14, 2024

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Colloid Science
  • Polymer Chemistry

Background:

  • Polymer grafted nanoparticles (PGNPs) exhibit complex self-assembly behaviors.
  • Understanding the driving forces behind PGNP self-assembly is crucial for designing advanced materials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a quantitative analogy between polymer grafted nanoparticles (PGNPs) and patchy nanoparticles (NPs).
  • To explain the anisotropic self-assembly of PGNPs using geometric considerations.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative analogy established between PGNPs and patchy NPs.
  • Analysis of PGNP behavior across relevant experimental parameter space.
  • Comparison with geometric models for surfactant self-assembly.

Main Results:

  • PGNPs quantitatively behave like Janus nanoparticles over a wide parameter range.
  • Patch size in PGNPs shows universal dependence on graft number and size ratios.
  • Anisotropic self-assembly of PGNPs can be explained by single patch geometric models.

Conclusions:

  • PGNPs can be effectively modeled as Janus nanoparticles.
  • Geometric principles govern the anisotropic self-assembly of PGNPs.
  • This analogy simplifies the understanding of PGNP self-assembly, drawing parallels to established surfactant models.