Related Experiment Videos
A response to Harris, Gould, and Fujiura: Beyond scoping reviews: a case for mixed-methods research reviews
Shawn M Fitzgerald1, Phillip D Rumrill2, William R Merchant3
1School of Education, Innovation, and Continuing Studies, Widener University, Chester, PA, USA.
Work (Reading, Mass.)
|December 16, 2014
Abstract:
This article serves as a response to the Work article on scoping literature reviews by Harris et al. [1]. Conceptualizing scoping reviews as an exploratory approach to organizing literature and research findings in a content area that is still developing, we propose a mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews that enables researchers to capture the breadth and depth of existing knowledge, thereby facilitating the transfer of research findings into field practice.