Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

669
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
669
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

18.2K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
18.2K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.5K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

7.3K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individual Differences in Great Ape Cognition Across Time and Domains: Stability, Structure, and Predictability.

Psychological science·2026
Same author

EVApeCognition: An 18-Year Dataset of Great Ape Cognition.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Animal cumulative culture through changing environments.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Local specialists' experience and skills in animal behaviour studies: insights from wild chimpanzee field assistants.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Behavioural manifestations of human-directed social motivation in dogs.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Chimpanzees rationally revise their beliefs.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same journal

Similar flight performance but sex-specific mitochondrial responses in free-flying pigeons.

Biology letters·2026
Same journal

Coral-associated fishes accelerate coral wound healing and photosynthetic recovery.

Biology letters·2026
Same journal

Cat colonies reshape the abundance and body size of lizards.

Biology letters·2026
Same journal

Visual signal dynamicity shapes detectability in the wild: an experiment with a mate-searching butterfly.

Biology letters·2026
Same journal

Transient marine species disproportionately expand the morphospace of North American continental freshwater fishes.

Biology letters·2026
Same journal

An unrecognized fine-scale host-plant adaptation in a leaf miner: correct dorsoventral egg orientation is essential for successful leaf entry.

Biology letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.2K

When maths trumps logic: probabilistic judgements in chimpanzees.

Daniel Hanus1, Josep Call2

  • 1Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany hanus@eva.mpg.de.

Biology Letters
|December 16, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Chimpanzees searching for food consider the probability ratio between options, but not the absolute safety of an option. They systematically prefer the more likely choice once a threshold is reached.

Keywords:
chimpanzeesnumerical cognitionprobabilities

More Related Videos

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.8K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.2K
Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.8K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive science
  • Animal behavior
  • Primate cognition

Background:

  • Understanding decision-making under uncertainty is crucial in cognitive science.
  • Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) exhibit complex foraging behaviors.
  • Assessing risk and probability influences survival and foraging success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether chimpanzees integrate information about the number of items and locations when searching for hidden food.
  • To determine if chimpanzees consider the probability ratio (PR) between options when making choices.
  • To examine if chimpanzees appreciate the value of a guaranteed safe option versus a probabilistic one.

Main Methods:

  • Chimpanzees were presented with two trays, each with a different food/cup ratio.
  • The likelihood of finding a baited cup varied between the trays.
  • A control condition was used to rule out low-level learning explanations.

Main Results:

  • Chimpanzee performance was influenced by the probability ratio (PR) between the two options.
  • Subjects did not appear to value a guaranteed safe option (P = 1.0).
  • Chimpanzees systematically preferred the more likely option once a certain PR threshold was met.

Conclusions:

  • Chimpanzees' foraging decisions are guided by the relative difference in probabilities (PR) rather than absolute certainty.
  • They demonstrate a bias towards the more probable choice, even when a completely safe option is available.
  • This suggests a specific mechanism for evaluating probabilistic rewards in chimpanzee decision-making.