Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

17.8K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
17.8K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

3.7K
3.7K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

9.5K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
9.5K
What is Population Genetics?01:25

What is Population Genetics?

66.3K
A population is composed of members of the same species that simultaneously live and interact in the same area. When individuals in a population breed, they pass down their genes to their offspring. Many of these genes are polymorphic, meaning that they occur in multiple variants. Such variations of a gene are referred to as alleles. The collective set of all the alleles within a population is known as the gene pool.
66.3K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

77.9K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
77.9K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

8.4K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
8.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rare protein-coding variation and the genetic architecture of height in >1.4 million individuals.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Population-scale repeat expansions elucidate disease risk and brain atrophy.

Nature·2026
Same author

Epigenetic profiling reveals key super-enhancer networks driving oncogenesis in HPV-positive HNSCC.

iScience·2025
Same author

Variant Classification Using Proteomics-Informed Large Language Models Increases Power of Rare Variant Association Studies and Enhances Target Discovery.

Genetic epidemiology·2025
Same author

Genetic disruption of the baculum compromises the ability of male mice to copulate.

PLoS genetics·2025
Same author

Sexual Size Dimorphism Correlates With the Number of Androgen Response Elements in Mammals, But Only in Small-Bodied Species.

Genome biology and evolution·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

4.2K

Effective population size does not predict codon usage bias in mammals.

Michael D Kessler1, Matthew D Dean1

  • 1Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, California, 90089.

Ecology and Evolution
|December 16, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Effective population size (N e) does not strongly predict codon usage bias (CUB) across mammalian species. While selection shapes CUB within species, interspecific differences in N e do not consistently explain variations in CUB intensity.

Keywords:
Codon usage biaseffective population sizeselection

More Related Videos

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K
A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains
07:14

A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains

Published on: January 16, 2026

390

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

4.2K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K
A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains
07:14

A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains

Published on: January 16, 2026

390

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Genomics
  • Molecular evolution

Background:

  • Codon usage bias (CUB) describes the non-uniform usage of synonymous codons.
  • It is hypothesized that the intensity of CUB is influenced by effective population size (N e), with weaker selection in species with smaller N e.
  • Understanding the drivers of CUB variation is crucial for comprehending genome evolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between effective population size (N e) and codon usage bias (CUB) across mammalian species.
  • To determine if interspecific variation in N e predicts differences in CUB intensity in mammals.
  • To explore factors influencing CUB variation within and between mammalian species.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of codon usage bias across 41 mammalian genomes using indirect proxies for N e (body mass, generation time).
  • Comparison of CUB between autosomal and X-linked genes, and genes with high versus low recombination rates.
  • Correlation analysis between genetic estimates of N e and CUB across six mammalian species (human, chimpanzee, rabbit, and three mouse species).

Main Results:

  • Codon usage bias was not correlated with body mass or generation time across 41 mammalian genomes.
  • Autosomal and high-recombination genes exhibited higher CUB than X-linked and low-recombination genes, respectively, suggesting intraspecific N e influences CUB.
  • Effective population size (N e) showed weak and inconsistent correlations with CUB across the six studied mammalian species.

Conclusions:

  • Interspecific divergence in effective population size (N e) does not strongly predict variation in codon usage bias (CUB) across mammals.
  • Intraspecific factors, such as recombination rate and gene location, appear to influence CUB more significantly than interspecific N e.
  • A unique distribution of selection coefficients across species may confound a direct link between N e and CUB.