Reliability and validity of the Upper Limb Physician's Rating Scale in children with cerebral palsy

Eun Sook Park1, Ji-Woon Joo1, Seon Ah Kim1

  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Yonsei Medical Journal
|December 17, 2014
PubMed

Insights

The Upper Limb Physician's Rating Scale (ULPRS) shows high reliability for assessing upper limb movement in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Its strong correlation with another measure supports its clinical use for spastic CP outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Movement Science

Background:

  • Cerebral palsy (CP) significantly impacts motor function, particularly in the upper limbs of affected children.
  • Botulinum toxin type A injections are a common intervention to manage spasticity in children with CP.
  • Objective outcome measures are crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions like botulinum toxin therapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the interrater and intrarater reliability of the Upper Limb Physician's Rating Scale (ULPRS).
  • To assess the concurrent validity of the ULPRS against the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (MUUL).
  • To determine the clinical utility of the ULPRS as an outcome measure for spastic upper limbs in children with CP.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty children with spastic CP (aged 5-13 years) participated in the study.
  • The ULPRS was administered by four physicians on two separate occasions using video recordings.
  • The MUUL was assessed by an occupational therapist; reliability and validity were analyzed using ICC, kappa, and Pearson correlation coefficients.

Main Results:

  • The ULPRS demonstrated high interrater reliability (ICC=0.94) and excellent intrarater reliability (ICC=0.99-1.00).
  • Subitem reliability for the ULPRS ranged from substantial to almost perfect agreement.
  • A strong positive correlation (r=0.751, p<0.05) was found between the ULPRS and MUUL scores.

Conclusions:

  • The ULPRS exhibits high reliability for total scores, both within and between raters.
  • The significant concurrent validity with the MUUL supports the ULPRS as a valuable clinical tool.
  • The ULPRS is a reliable and valid measure for assessing spastic upper limb function in children with CP.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos