Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
The blind spot in risk ethics: managing natural hazards
1Department of Technology, Policy and Management, Technical University Delft, PO Box 5015, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands;. N.Doorn@tudelft.nl.
Abstract:
Many risk scholars recognize the importance of including ethical considerations in risk management. Risk ethics can provide in-depth ethical analysis so that ethical considerations can be part of risk-related decisions, rather than an afterthought to those decisions. In this article, I present a brief sketch of the field of risk ethics. I argue that risk ethics has a bias toward technological hazards, thereby overlooking the risks that stem from natural and semi-natural hazards. In order to make a contribution to the field of risk research, risks ethics should broaden its scope to include natural and semi-natural hazards and develop normative distribution criteria that can support decision making on such hazards.
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Rate
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Survey Safety
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

