Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

08:12
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
3.1K
Is there such a thing as "group selection" in the, contextual analysis framework?
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
|December 18, 2014
Summary
The contextual approach to natural selection misinterprets group selection, failing to distinguish between individual and group levels. It redefines group selection as individual-level frequency-dependent selection, not a distinct multilevel process.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Theoretical Ecology
Background:
- Multi-level selection theory examines evolutionary processes at different biological levels.
- The contextual approach offers a framework for analyzing selection pressures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the contextual approach's ability to estimate contributions of individual and group selection.
- To clarify the definition and level of action for 'group selection' within the contextual framework.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of the contextual approach to natural selection.
- Examination of the definitions of individual and group selection within this framework.
Main Results:
- The contextual approach does not provide an estimation of individual versus group selection contributions.
- The term 'group selection' in this approach describes individual-level frequency-dependent selection, not a group-level process.
Conclusions:
- The contextual approach conflates distinct levels of selection.
- It isolates aspects of individual-environment interactions rather than identifying separate selection levels.
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
44.2K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
44.2K
Types of Selection
46.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.7K
Impact of Groups on Individuals
591
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
591
Impact of Groups on Groups
331
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
331
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
485
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
485
Group Design
11.1K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.1K

