Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026
05:53
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
10.9K
How reliable are case formulations? A systematic literature review
Lucinda Flinn1,2, Louise Braham1,2, Roshan das Nair1,3,4
1Trent Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK.
The British Journal of Clinical Psychology
|December 18, 2014
Summary
The reliability of case formulations varies across different theoretical approaches, but can be enhanced with training and experience. Further research is needed to confirm these findings on case formulation reliability.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychotherapy Research
Background:
- Case formulation is a cornerstone of clinical psychology practice.
- Assessing the reliability of case formulations is crucial for ensuring consistent and dependable clinical reasoning.
- Existing literature on the reliability of case formulations across different theoretical orientations requires systematic synthesis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of case formulations.
- To examine the reliability of case formulations across various theoretical modalities.
- To evaluate the methodological quality of primary research studies on case formulation reliability.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across five electronic databases.
- Reference list trawling was employed to identify additional relevant studies.
- A bespoke methodological quality assessment tool was developed and utilized for study evaluation.
Main Results:
- Inter-rater reliability for case formulations generally ranged from slight to substantial.
- Training and increased clinical experience were associated with improved agreement in case formulations.
- Psychodynamic formulations showed slightly higher reliability than cognitive or behavioral formulations, though methodological considerations were noted.
Conclusions:
- The reliability of case formulations is variable but improvable across different theoretical approaches.
- Training and clinical experience are key factors in enhancing case formulation reliability.
- Further research is necessary to solidify conclusions regarding case formulation reliability.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Case Studies
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
01:25Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
01:16Clinical Trials
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
01:23Methods of Documentation V: CBE
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
01:15Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...