Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

91.6K
Overview
91.6K
Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

19.8K
19.8K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

415
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
415
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

342
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
342
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

128.8K
Overview
128.8K
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

15.8K
15.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

TANK potentiates antiviral innate immunity by recruiting deubiquitinase USP46 to activate IKKε.

PLoS pathogens·2026
Same author

METTL3 suppresses pyroptosis in obstructive sleep apnea-associated hypertension via YTHDF2-mediated SOX4 mRNA degradation.

Journal of physiology and biochemistry·2026
Same author

Photoprotective Effects of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> Protein Hydrolysate Fractions Against UVB-Induced Photoaging Associated with Modulation of MAPK/NF-κB and TGF-β/Smad Signaling.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

USP25 Promotes Glycolysis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells and Enhances Tumor Immunity.

Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis·2026
Same author

A palladium-catalyzed three-component tandem reaction of thioamides, arenediazonium tetrafluoroborates and DABSO: an efficient synthesis of arylsulfonyl 1,3-benzothiazines.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

Light-Induced Proton Transfer Tautomeric Frustrated Lewis Pairs on Carbon Nitride.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

A penalized linear mixed model for genomic prediction using pedigree structures.

Can Yang1, Cong Li2, Mengjie Chen2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

BMC Proceedings
|December 19, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Combining pedigree data with single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes significantly improves prediction of systolic blood pressure. Including low-frequency variants from sequencing data did not further enhance prediction accuracy in this study.

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.9K
Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing
08:39

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.9K
Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing
08:39

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Genomic Prediction
  • Cardiovascular Research

Background:

  • Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 (GAW18) focused on evaluating genomic prediction accuracy.
  • Diverse pedigree structures were available for prediction analysis.
  • Systolic blood pressure (SBP) prediction is crucial for cardiovascular health management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the utility of combining pedigree information with single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data for predicting SBP.
  • To assess the impact of different data types (SNP array vs. sequencing) on prediction accuracy.
  • To determine if incorporating low-frequency variants improves SBP prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized GAW18 data, including pedigree structures and SNP genotypes from array and sequencing data.
  • Developed prediction models for SBP incorporating pedigree information and SNP data.
  • Compared prediction performance using different genetic data sources (common variants vs. common plus low-frequency variants).

Main Results:

  • Pedigree information alone yielded unsatisfactory SBP prediction power.
  • Integrating SNP genotypes substantially improved prediction accuracy.
  • The improvement was most pronounced when a few SNPs had larger effect sizes.
  • Including low-frequency variants from sequencing data did not enhance prediction accuracy compared to common variants alone.

Conclusions:

  • Combining pedigree and SNP genotype data is superior to using pedigree alone for SBP prediction.
  • Genomic prediction accuracy for SBP benefits from incorporating SNP data, especially variants with larger effects.
  • Low-frequency variants do not appear to improve SBP prediction accuracy in this context.