TIDEL-II: first-line use of imatinib in CML with early switch to nilotinib for failure to achieve time-dependent

David T Yeung1, Michael P Osborn2, Deborah L White3

  • 1Department of Haematology, and Department of Genetics and Molecular Pathology and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia; Discipline of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group, Melbourne, Australia;

Blood
|December 19, 2014
PubMed

Insights

The TIDEL-II study shows that starting chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment with imatinib, and switching to nilotinib if molecular targets are missed, is effective. This approach achieved high molecular response rates and survival in CML patients.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) requires effective initial treatment strategies.
  • Optimizing molecular response in de novo CML is crucial for long-term outcomes.
  • The TIDEL-II study investigated an intensified treatment approach for newly diagnosed CML.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of an imatinib-based treatment strategy with early, selective switching to nilotinib in de novo CML.
  • To assess molecular response rates, overall survival, and transformation-free survival.
  • To determine the feasibility of intensifying imatinib treatment based on plasma trough levels and molecular response.

Main Methods:

  • The TIDEL-II study enrolled 210 de novo CML patients in two cohorts.
  • Patients initiated imatinib 600 mg/day, with dose escalation to 800 mg/day if plasma trough levels were <1000 ng/mL at day 22.
  • Treatment adjustments (escalation to imatinib or switch to nilotinib) were based on predefined BCR-ABL1 molecular targets at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Main Results:

  • At 2 years, 55% of patients remained on imatinib and 30% on nilotinib.
  • Only 12% of patients had BCR-ABL1 >10% at 3 months.
  • Confirmed major molecular response was achieved in 73% at 24 months, with 34% achieving MR4.5.
  • Three-year overall survival was 96%, and transformation-free survival was 95%.

Conclusions:

  • An imatinib-based treatment strategy with selective, early switching to nilotinib is feasible and effective for de novo CML.
  • This approach leads to high rates of molecular response and favorable long-term survival.
  • Treatment intensification based on early monitoring of imatinib levels and molecular response is a viable strategy for CML management.

Related Concept Videos

Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
9.2K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
6.4K
Treatment Resistent Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistent Cancers

1.5K
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.9K