[Therapy of pediatric femoral fractures. Two versus three elastic stable intramedullary nails]

A Semaan1, T Klein, T M Boemers

  • 1Klinik für Kinderchirurgie und Kinderurologie, Kinderkrankenhaus, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Amsterdamer Str. 59, 50735, Köln, Deutschland, papers.semaan@gmail.com.

Der Unfallchirurg
|December 19, 2014
PubMed

Insights

Using three elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESINs) for pediatric femoral fractures offers no advantages over two ESINs. Three ESINs resulted in leg length discrepancy and hip joint mobility issues, suggesting two ESINs are preferable.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Pediatric orthopedics
  • Biomechanical analysis

Background:

  • Conservative treatment of pediatric femoral fractures involves prolonged immobilization, causing significant burdens.
  • Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) offers a shorter immobilization period and improved outcomes compared to conservative methods.
  • This study investigates the comparative efficacy of two versus three ESINs for pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of using two versus three elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESINs) in treating pediatric femoral shaft fractures.
  • To evaluate potential differences in leg length discrepancy, joint mobility, and surgical time between the two techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of pediatric patients treated with ESINs for femoral fractures between 2009 and 2012.
  • Standardized follow-up examinations assessed leg length discrepancy and hip/knee joint range of motion.
  • Surgical time for implant removal was also recorded and compared.

Main Results:

  • Treatment with three ESINs led to statistically significant leg length discrepancy (p=0.013) and impaired hip joint movement (p=0.029).
  • The surgical time for removing three ESINs was significantly longer (p=0.046).
  • No significant differences were observed in other evaluated parameters between the two and three ESIN groups.

Conclusions:

  • Using three ESINs for pediatric femoral shaft fractures provides no discernible benefits over using two ESINs.
  • The observed leg length discrepancy with three ESINs may stem from asymmetrical support, leading to increased micromovement and callus formation.
  • Current evidence suggests that three ESINs should not be routinely used for treating pediatric femoral fractures.
Abstract