Prospective assessment of suicidal ideation and behavior: an internet survey of pharmaceutical sponsor practices

, Phillip B Chappell1, Atul R Mahableshwarkar1

  • 1Dr. Chappell is with Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut; Dr. Mahableshwarkar is with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Deerfield, Illinois; Dr. Alphs is with Janssen Scientific Affairs, Titusville, New Jersey; Dr. Bangs is with Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; Mr. Butler is with Bracket Global, Wayne, Pennsylvania; Ms. DuBrava is with Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut; Dr. Greist is Clinical Adjunct Professor of Psychiatry at University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; Dr. Lenderking is with Evidera, Bethesda, Maryland; Dr. Mundt is with Center for Telepsychology, Madison, Wisconsin; and Dr. Stewart is with Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut.

Abstract

Insights

Clinical trial sponsors widely implement suicidal ideation and behavior assessments, often using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Challenges include cross-cultural differences and rater training, impacting data consistency.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical trial methodology
  • Psychiatric research
  • Regulatory science

Background:

  • The US FDA issued guidance in 2010 for prospective suicidal ideation and behavior assessments in clinical trials.
  • The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Assessment Workgroup aimed to understand industry practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey clinical trial sponsors' current approaches to prospective suicidal ideation and behavior assessments.
  • To identify challenges encountered during the implementation of these assessments.

Main Methods:

  • An online survey was distributed to 1,447 industry employees across 178 pharmaceutical companies.
  • A 30-item survey assessed challenges and issues in implementing prospective suicidal ideation and behavior assessments.
  • 89 evaluable responses from 39 companies were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • High implementation rates (95%) for assessments in psychiatric/neurologic drug trials, driven by CNS activity, disease, patient population, and regulations.
  • Key challenges included cross-cultural differences (40%), baseline history (36.8%), translations (35%), rater discomfort (32%), and inadequate rater training (30%).

Conclusions:

  • Implementation of suicidal ideation and behavior assessments in CNS studies is high, with the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale being commonly used.
  • Challenges in standardization and data analysis raise concerns about inconsistent reporting and cross-study data integration.

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
2.0K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.3K
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios01:26

Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios

Pharmaceutical poisoning can occur through various channels, impacting an estimated 2 million hospitalized patients in the U.S. annually with serious adverse drug responses. These scenarios encompass both therapeutic uses, such as drug toxicity, where even standard dosages can lead to severe central nervous system depression, and non-therapeutic exposures, including accidental ingestion by children, and environmental and occupational exposures.Unintentional poisonings often involve exploratory...
103
Survey Safety01:28

Survey Safety

Surveying near highways, rough terrain, or power lines involves significant risks. Working along highways is particularly dangerous and requires the use of warning signs and flagmen. It is safest to avoid working directly on roads and use offsets whenever possible. When highway work is unavoidable, it must follow all safety guidelines. Surveyors should wear bright clothing, such as orange reflective vests, to ensure visibility to motorists, coworkers, and hunters. In construction zones, wearing...
506
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.5K
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
229