Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Chronic sleep restriction induces oculomotor impairment with inadequate compensation.

Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society·2026

Same author

Effects of binocularity and eye dominance on visually-driven ocular tracking.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025

Same author

Oculometric biomarkers of visuomotor deficits in clinically asymptomatic patients with systemic lupus erythematosus undergoing long-term hydroxychloroquine treatment.

Frontiers in ophthalmology·2024

Same author

Differential saccade-pursuit coordination under sleep loss and low-dose alcohol.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2023

Same author

Visuomotor predictors of batting performance in baseball players.

Journal of vision·2021

Same author

Dose-dependent sensorimotor impairment in human ocular tracking after acute low-dose alcohol administration.

The Journal of physiology·2020

Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

Oculometric assessment of dynamic visual processing.

Dorion B Liston¹, Leland S Stone²

¹NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA San José State University, San José, CA, USA.

Journal of Vision

|December 21, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a 15-minute eye movement test to assess sensorimotor function. The new method reliably measures visual tracking performance, offering a potential tool for diagnosing various neurological and visual disorders.

Keywords:

assessment clinical oculometrics pursuit screening

More Related Videos

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Ophthalmology
Biomedical Engineering

Background:

Eye movements are frequent, rapid voluntary actions crucial for sensorimotor processing.
Assessing sensorimotor disturbances requires reliable and efficient behavioral tracking methods.
Current methods for evaluating visual motion perception can be time-consuming and less efficient.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a novel 15-minute behavioral tracking protocol for assessing eye movement responses to visual motion.
To establish oculometric functions for quantifying pursuit initiation, steady-state tracking, direction, and speed tuning.
To provide a quantitative baseline of normal human ocular tracking performance for clinical applications.

Main Methods:

A 15-minute protocol using randomized step-ramp radial target motion was employed.
Oculomotor data were analyzed to derive direction- and speed-tuning oculometric functions.
The protocol's repeatability and validity were assessed using psychometric criteria, and performance was documented across 41 healthy individuals.

Main Results:

The developed protocol reliably measures eye movement responses, demonstrating repeatability across sessions.
Metrics showed expected changes with degraded visual motion stimuli, confirming validity.
A comprehensive distribution of normal ocular tracking performance metrics was established, minimizing practice and expectation effects.

Conclusions:

The 15-minute eye movement test provides an efficient and reliable method for quantifying sensorimotor performance.
The computed metrics can serve as a valuable screening or assessment tool for disorders affecting sensorimotor processing.
This approach offers significant efficiency gains over traditional psychophysical methods for visual motion assessment.