Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advantages of using development models of the carrion beetles Thanatophilus micans (Fabricius) and T. mutilatus (Castelneau) (Coleoptera: Silphidae) for estimating minimum post mortem intervals, verified with case data.

International journal of legal medicineĀ·2013
Same author

Population genetic structure of economically important Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) in South Africa: a comparative analysis.

Bulletin of entomological researchĀ·2009
Same author

Gene flow among Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) geographic and host populations in South Africa.

Journal of economic entomologyĀ·2006
Same author

Genetic diversity of woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum (Hemiptera: Aphididae) populations in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Bulletin of entomological researchĀ·2005

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Laser Capture Microdissection of Drosophila Peripheral Neurons
12:02

Laser Capture Microdissection of Drosophila Peripheral Neurons

Published on: May 24, 2010

14.1K

Comparison of RNA isolation methods from insect larvae.

J A Ridgeway1, A E Timm2

  • 1Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown 6139, South Africa jarydridgeway@gmail.com.

Journal of Insect Science (Online)
|December 21, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Comparing four insect RNA isolation methods, the RNeasy Mini Kit and SV Total RNA isolation system yielded high-quality RNA. The SV Total RNA isolation system is recommended for stringent molecular entomology applications.

Keywords:
CTABRNA extractionRNeasy Mini KitSV Total RNA isolation systemTRIzol reagent

More Related Videos

RNA Isolation from Cell Specific Subpopulations Using Laser-capture Microdissection Combined with Rapid Immunolabeling
07:01

RNA Isolation from Cell Specific Subpopulations Using Laser-capture Microdissection Combined with Rapid Immunolabeling

Published on: April 11, 2015

13.1K
Mass-Rearing and Molecular Studies in Tortricidae Pest Insects
06:22

Mass-Rearing and Molecular Studies in Tortricidae Pest Insects

Published on: March 25, 2022

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Laser Capture Microdissection of Drosophila Peripheral Neurons
12:02

Laser Capture Microdissection of Drosophila Peripheral Neurons

Published on: May 24, 2010

14.1K
RNA Isolation from Cell Specific Subpopulations Using Laser-capture Microdissection Combined with Rapid Immunolabeling
07:01

RNA Isolation from Cell Specific Subpopulations Using Laser-capture Microdissection Combined with Rapid Immunolabeling

Published on: April 11, 2015

13.1K
Mass-Rearing and Molecular Studies in Tortricidae Pest Insects
06:22

Mass-Rearing and Molecular Studies in Tortricidae Pest Insects

Published on: March 25, 2022

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular entomology
  • RNA isolation techniques
  • Comparative genomics

Background:

  • Accurate RNA isolation is crucial for molecular entomology research.
  • Previous comparisons of RNA isolation methods in insects are limited and outdated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of four different RNA isolation methods.
  • To evaluate RNA quality and quantity across various insect species.
  • To identify the optimal method for high-quality RNA extraction in insects.

Main Methods:

  • Four RNA isolation methods were tested: RNeasy Mini Kit, SV Total RNA isolation system, TRIzol reagent, and a CTAB-based method.
  • Whole-body larvae from four insect species (Thaumatotibia leucotreta, Thanatophilus micans, Plutella xylostella, Tenebrio molitor) were used.
  • RNA quality, quantity, and DNA contamination were assessed.

Main Results:

  • RNA quality varied significantly among methods, but quantity did not.
  • CTAB and TRIzol methods yielded lower quality RNA compared to RNeasy Mini Kit and SV Total RNA isolation system.
  • All methods produced RNA suitable for subsequent cDNA synthesis and gene amplification (cytochrome oxidase I).
  • The SV Total RNA isolation system demonstrated the highest RNA integrity and lowest DNA contamination.

Conclusions:

  • The RNeasy Mini Kit and SV Total RNA isolation system are superior for obtaining high-quality insect RNA.
  • The SV Total RNA isolation system is recommended for applications requiring stringent RNA quality.
  • Insect species did not significantly impact RNA yield or quality across the tested methods.