Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Multiparametric Optical Mapping of the Langendorff-perfused Rabbit Heart
Published on: September 13, 2011
Application of ripple mapping to visualize slow conduction channels within the infarct-related left ventricular scar
Shahnaz Jamil-Copley1, Pasquale Vergara1, Corrado Carbucicchio1
1From the Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.J.-C., N.L., M.K.-W., V.L., D.P.F., N.S.P., D.W.D., P.K.); Arrhythmology and Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, San Raffaele Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy (P.V., P.D.B.); and Department of Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy (C.C., C.T.).
Background:
Ripple mapping (RM) displays each electrogram at its 3-dimensional coordinate as a bar changing in length according to its voltage-time relationship with a fiduciary reference. We applied RM to left ventricular ischemic scar for evidence of slow-conducting channels that may act as ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate.
Methods And Results:
CARTO-3© (Biosense Webster Inc, Diamond Bar, CA) maps in patient undergoing VT ablation were analyzed on an offline MatLab RM system. Scar was assessed for sequential movement of ripple bars, during sinus rhythm or pacing, which were distinct from surrounding tissue and termed RM conduction channels (RMCC). Conduction velocity was measured within RMCCs and compared with the healthy myocardium (>1.5 mV). In 21 maps, 77 RMCCs were identified. Conduction velocity in RMCCs was slower when compared with normal left ventricular myocardium (median, 54 [interquartile range, 40-86] versus 150 [interquartile range, 120-160] cm/s; P<0.001). All 7 sites meeting conventional criteria for diastolic pathways coincided with an RMCC. Seven patients had ablation colocating to all identified RMCCs with no VT recurrence during follow-up (median, 480 [interquartile range, 438-841] days). Fourteen patients had ≥1 RMCC with no ablation lesions. Five had recurrence during follow-up (median, 466 [interquartile range, 395-694] days). One of the 2 patients with no RMCC locations ablated had VT recurrence at 605 days post procedure. RMCCs were sensitive (100%; negative predictive value, 100%) for VT recurrence but the specificity (43%; positive predictive value, 35.7%) may be limited by blind alleys channels.
Conclusions:
RM identifies slow conduction channels within ischemic scar and needs further prospective investigation to understand the role of RMCCs in determining the VT substrate.
More Related Videos
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025