Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

582
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
582
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.7K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.7K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

2.2K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.2K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.7K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Peritraumatic C-reactive protein levels predict pain outcomes following traumatic stress exposure in a sex-dependent manner.

The journal of pain·2026
Same author

How to apply Bayesian stochastic search variable selection with multiply imputed data.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Defining the <i>r</i> factor for post-trauma resilience and its neural predictors.

Nature. Mental health·2025
Same author

Brain dynamics reflecting an intra-network brain state is associated with increased posttraumatic stress symptoms in the early aftermath of trauma.

Nature. Mental health·2025
Same author

Childhood Adversity Is Associated With Longitudinal White Matter Changes After Adulthood Trauma.

Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging·2025
Same author

Smartphone language features may help identify adverse post-traumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae and their trajectories.

NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.9K

Interpretational Confounding or Confounded Interpretations of Causal Indicators?

Sierra A Bainter1, Kenneth A Bollen2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Measurement : Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
|December 23, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Causal indicators in measurement theory are debated. This study challenges claims of their inherent susceptibility to interpretational confounding, showing stable coefficients in simulations.

Keywords:
causal indicatorsformative measurementlatent variablesmeasurementstructural equation modeling

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.9K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Measurement theory
  • Psychometrics
  • Causal inference

Background:

  • Causal indicators in measurement theory are controversial and poorly understood.
  • Methodological debates focus on their susceptibility to interpretational confounding.
  • Interpretational confounding occurs when a latent construct's empirical meaning diverges from the researcher's intended meaning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To question the validity of evidence suggesting causal indicators are inherently prone to interpretational confounding.
  • To investigate the stability of causal indicator coefficients.
  • To clarify the conceptualization and evaluation of measurement models.

Main Methods:

  • Critically evaluate existing evidence on causal indicators and interpretational confounding.
  • Conduct a simulation study to assess the stability of causal indicator coefficients.
  • Analyze the implications for measurement theory and model evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Evidence used to support the inherent susceptibility of causal indicators to interpretational confounding is questioned.
  • Simulation results demonstrate that causal indicator coefficients are stable across correctly-specified models.
  • The findings challenge the notion that causal indicators are inherently problematic.

Conclusions:

  • Causal indicators are not inherently susceptible to interpretational confounding as previously claimed.
  • The stability of causal indicator coefficients supports their valid use in measurement models.
  • Revisiting the conceptualization of measurement and evaluation of measurement models is necessary.