Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Protein Networks

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...

Protein Networks

Protein Networks

Protein Organization

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....

Protein-protein Interfaces

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...

Conserved Binding Sites

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...

Protein and Protein Structures

Protein and Protein Structures

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

AP2B1, a protein involved in endocytic trafficking, is associated with congenital heart defects when mutated.

Genes & diseases·2026

Same author

DruGUI 2.0: mapping protein druggability with probe-based molecular dynamics.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

hexABC seeking the physical code of DNA.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

15-LOX-catalytic bias towards ether-(alkenyl)-ETE-PEs oxidation bestows selectivity of PRO-ferroptotic cell death signaling.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Structural and molecular determinants of glutamate transporter allosteric modulators.

Molecular pharmacology·2026

Same author

Prognostic impact of pleural effusion in acute heart failure and its link to diuretic therapy.

The American journal of medicine·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

FlexE: Using elastic network models to compare models of protein structure.

Alberto Perez¹, Zheng Yang², Ivet Bahar²

¹Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5252.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

|December 23, 2014

Summary

We introduce FlexE, a novel method for protein structure comparison. FlexE uses deformation energy from an elastic network model to assess similarity, capturing flexibility beyond fixed geometry methods.

More Related Videos

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Analyzing Protein Architectures and Protein-Ligand Complexes by Integrative Structural Mass Spectrometry

Analyzing Protein Architectures and Protein-Ligand Complexes by Integrative Structural Mass Spectrometry

Published on: October 15, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Analyzing Protein Architectures and Protein-Ligand Complexes by Integrative Structural Mass Spectrometry

Analyzing Protein Architectures and Protein-Ligand Complexes by Integrative Structural Mass Spectrometry

Published on: October 15, 2018

Area of Science:

Biophysics
Structural Biology
Computational Biology

Background:

Protein structure comparison is crucial for understanding biological function.
Existing methods like RMSD and GDT-TS rely on fixed geometry, neglecting protein flexibility.
This limitation hinders the accurate assessment of biologically relevant conformational changes.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a novel method, FlexE, for protein structure comparison.
To incorporate protein flexibility and energy landscape into structural similarity assessment.
To differentiate between biologically significant and random structural variations.

Main Methods:

FlexE utilizes a simple elastic network model.
Deformation energy is calculated as the primary measure of structural similarity.
The method integrates the concept of thermal energy for defining structural equivalence.

Main Results:

FlexE successfully distinguishes biologically relevant conformational changes from random fluctuations.
The method provides a measure of similarity that accounts for intrinsic protein flexibility.
FlexE offers a rational approach to determine when two protein models are conformationally equivalent.

Conclusions:

FlexE offers a complementary approach to existing geometry-based protein structure comparison methods.
The method's ability to capture flexibility enhances the biological relevance of structural comparisons.
FlexE provides a unique and valuable metric for assessing protein structural similarity.