Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

An Ex vivo Assay to Study Candida albicans Hyphal Morphogenesis in the Gastrointestinal Tract
Published on: July 1, 2020
Secondary antifungal prophylaxis in hematological malignancy patients with previous invasive fungal disease: a
Mingjuan Liu1, Yan Li2, Yongqing Zhang3
1Department of Hematology and BMT center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China; Department of Hematology, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 17 Heishanhu Road, Beijing 100091, China.
Background:
Invasive fungal disease (IFD) causes morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancy. Recurrence of IFD after chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with poor prognosis. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of different strategies of secondary antifungal prophylaxis (SAP) for IFD and choose an appropriate SAP regimen.
Methods:
Clinical data of patients with previous IFD who underwent chemotherapy or HSCT between Jan 2008 and Jun 2013 were retrospectively reviewed and followed up to 180 days post-chemotherapy or HSCT. The clinical characteristics and diagnosis were analyzed according to the diagnostic criteria for IFD. The efficacy of different strategies for SAP and risk factors influencing the failure of SAP were evaluated.
Results:
Of the 164 patients enrolled, 121 patients received SAP regimen (73.78%), and IFD recurred in 40 patients: 16.5% (20/121) in SAP group and 46.5% (20/43) in non-SAP group. In SAP group, 58 received SAP agents which were proven effective for their previous IFD, while other 63 patients received other broad-spectrum antifungal agents. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rates between these two subgroups (13.8% (8/58) vs 19.0% (12/63), P = 0.437). The IFD recurrence rates were statistically significant between patients with allogeneic HSCT and chemotherapy or autologous HSCT (25% vs 8.2%, P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis indicated that allogeneic HSCT was the independent risk factor of IFD recurrence after SAP.
Conclusions:
Secondary antifungal prophylaxis is necessary to prevent IFD recurrence in patients with hematological malignancy, especially for patients in the setting of allogeneic HSCT.
Insights
Secondary antifungal prophylaxis (SAP) is crucial for preventing invasive fungal disease (IFD) recurrence in patients with hematological malignancy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) significantly increases IFD recurrence risk, necessitating tailored SAP strategies.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Infectious Diseases
- Oncology
Background:
- Invasive fungal disease (IFD) poses a significant threat, causing morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematological malignancies.
- Recurrence of IFD post-treatment is linked to poorer patient outcomes, highlighting the need for effective preventive strategies.
- Secondary antifungal prophylaxis (SAP) is a key consideration for managing IFD in this vulnerable patient population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of various secondary antifungal prophylaxis (SAP) strategies in preventing invasive fungal disease (IFD) recurrence.
- To identify the most appropriate SAP regimen for patients with hematological malignancy.
- To determine risk factors associated with SAP failure in the context of IFD.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of clinical data from 164 patients with prior IFD who underwent chemotherapy or HSCT between January 2008 and June 2013.
- Follow-up of patients for 180 days post-chemotherapy or HSCT to assess IFD recurrence.
- Analysis of clinical characteristics, diagnosis, SAP efficacy, and risk factors for SAP failure based on established IFD criteria.
Main Results:
- Patients receiving SAP (73.78%) had a significantly lower IFD recurrence rate (16.5%) compared to those not receiving SAP (46.5%).
- No significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between patients receiving SAP agents proven effective for their previous IFD versus those receiving other broad-spectrum antifungals (13.8% vs 19.0%).
- Allogeneic HSCT was identified as an independent risk factor for IFD recurrence after SAP (25% recurrence vs 8.2% in chemotherapy or autologous HSCT patients).
Conclusions:
- Secondary antifungal prophylaxis (SAP) is essential for preventing invasive fungal disease (IFD) recurrence in patients with hematological malignancy.
- The risk of IFD recurrence is particularly elevated in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, underscoring the importance of SAP in this subgroup.
- Further research may be warranted to optimize SAP regimens for high-risk patient populations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antifungal Agents
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy...
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...

