Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving the accuracy of automated labeling of specimen images datasets via a confidence-based process.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Forces for free: Vision-based contact force estimation with a compliant hand.

Science robotics·2025
Same author

Chain-based lattice printing for efficient robotically-assembled structures.

Communications engineering·2024
Same author

Robust whole-hand spatial manipulation via energy maps with caging, rolling, and sliding.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2023
Same author

Trajectory Control-An Effective Strategy for Controlling Multi-DOF Upper Limb Prosthetic Devices.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2022
Same author

Complex manipulation with a simple robotic hand through contact breaking and caging.

Science robotics·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.4K

Analysis of human grasping behavior: correlating tasks, objects and grasps.

Thomas Feix, Ian M Bullock, Aaron M Dollar

    IEEE Transactions on Haptics
    |December 23, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Human grasp behavior in daily tasks reveals object size, task constraints, and mass predict grasp type. Traditional grasp categories may be too simplistic, as power grasps are versatile for various objects.

    More Related Videos

    Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
    10:51

    Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

    Published on: January 15, 2018

    9.1K
    Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace
    09:11

    Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace

    Published on: August 8, 2019

    6.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

    Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
    09:41

    Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

    Published on: April 21, 2023

    2.4K
    Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
    10:51

    Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

    Published on: January 15, 2018

    9.1K
    Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace
    09:11

    Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace

    Published on: August 8, 2019

    6.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Human-robot interaction
    • Robotics
    • Biomechanics

    Background:

    • Understanding human grasping is crucial for developing advanced robotic systems.
    • Previous research often simplifies grasp categorization, potentially limiting robotic grasp planning.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze human grasping behavior in unstructured daily tasks.
    • To identify key object and task properties that predict grasp type.
    • To evaluate the appropriateness of traditional grasp classifications.

    Main Methods:

    • Observational study of housekeepers and machinists performing daily tasks.
    • Classification of tasks based on force, degrees of freedom, and functional type.
    • Correlation analysis of grasp type, object properties (size, mass), and task attributes.

    Main Results:

    • Object size, task constraints, and object mass were the best predictors of grasp type, achieving 47% accuracy.
    • 46% of tasks involved constrained manipulation (less than six degrees of freedom).
    • Precision grasps were not always used for small, lightweight objects (61% of the time for objects <2cm, <20g).

    Conclusions:

    • Grasp selection is influenced by a combination of object properties and task constraints.
    • The traditional power, intermediate, and precision grasp categories may be insufficient.
    • Findings offer valuable heuristics for grasp planning in robotic systems and inform robotic hand design.