Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Relating Stomatal Conductance to Leaf Functional Traits
Published on: October 12, 2015
Pore size regulates operating stomatal conductance, while stomatal densities drive the partitioning of conductance
Dimitrios Fanourakis1, Habtamu Giday2, Rubén Milla2
1IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Institute for Bio- and Geosciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany, Aarhus University, Department of Food Science, Kirstinebjergvej 10, DK-5792 Årslev, Denmark, Departamento de Biología y Geología, Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, Móstoles 28933, Spain, Institute for Biology I, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany and Max Planck Partner Group at the Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil dimitrios.fanourakis82@gmail.com.
Background And Aims:
Leaf gas exchange is influenced by stomatal size, density, distribution between the leaf adaxial and abaxial sides, as well as by pore dimensions. This study aims to quantify which of these traits mainly underlie genetic differences in operating stomatal conductance (gs) and addresses possible links between anatomical traits and regulation of pore width.
Methods:
Stomatal responsiveness to desiccation, gs-related anatomical traits of each leaf side and estimated gs (based on these traits) were determined for 54 introgression lines (ILs) generated by introgressing segments of Solanum pennelli into the S. lycopersicum 'M82'. A quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis for stomatal traits was also performed.
Key Results:
A wide genetic variation in stomatal responsiveness to desiccation was observed, a large part of which was explained by stomatal length. Operating gs ranged over a factor of five between ILs. The pore area per stomatal area varied 8-fold among ILs (2-16 %), and was the main determinant of differences in operating gs between ILs. Operating gs was primarily positioned on the abaxial surface (60-83 %), due to higher abaxial stomatal density and, secondarily, to larger abaxial pore area. An analysis revealed 64 QTLs for stomatal traits in the ILs, most of which were in the direction of S. pennellii.
Conclusions:
The data indicate that operating and maximum gs of non-stressed leaves maintained under stable conditions deviate considerably (by 45-91 %), because stomatal size inadequately reflects operating pore area (R(2) = 0·46). Furthermore, it was found that variation between ILs in both stomatal sensitivity to desiccation and operating gs is associated with features of individual stoma. In contrast, genotypic variation in gs partitioning depends on the distribution of stomata between the leaf adaxial and abaxial epidermis.
More Related Videos
11:31Author Spotlight: Image-Based Methods to Study Membrane Trafficking Events in Stomatal Lineage Cells
Published on: May 12, 2023
12:11Measurement of Leaf Hydraulic Conductance and Stomatal Conductance and Their Responses to Irradiance and Dehydration Using the Evaporative Flux Method EFM
Published on: December 31, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Xylem and Transpiration-driven Transport of Resources
Light Acquisition
Cell Size
Surface Area
Cells can take in nutrients and water via diffusion through the plasma membrane itself or through specific channels in the membrane. The area of the membrane surrounding...
Pore Size Distribution
Adequate...