Analysis of outcomes in patients with supra-diaphragmatic vs infra-diaphragmatic diffuse large B cell lymphoma...

The prognostic implications of infra-diaphragmatic (InD) versus supra-diaphragmatic (SpD) primary lesions in limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains unknown. This retrospective study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of spD and InD lesions as well as presence of gastrointestinal (GI) involvements in adults with limited-stage DLBCL. We analyzed data from 178 patients with limited-stage DLBCL who were treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone therapy at 7 institutions of the Yokohama City University Hematology Group between 2003 and 2009. The median age was 63 years (range, 18-80 years). The primary sites were SpD in 109 patients, and InD in 69. No statistical differences in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were observed between patients with SpD lesions and those with InD lesions. However, when patients with SpD lesions, InD lesions with (n=35), and without (n=34) GI involvement were compared, the presence of GI lesions was associated with favorable PFS. The multivariate analysis revealed that SpD or InD localization had no independent effect on PFS or OS, whereas the presence of GI lesions was correlated with favorable PFS (P=0.024, HR 0.09).