Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

6.9K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
6.9K
Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

5.3K
When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
5.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Instruction-Guided Attentional Focus on Jump Performance in Women's Artistic Gymnastics.

European journal of sport science·2025
Same author

Spatial Differences in Avoidable Mortality Across 581 European Districts, 2002-2019.

European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie·2025
Same author

Getting closer to each other? Convergence and divergence patterns of life expectancy in 277 border regions of Western Europe 1995-2019.

European journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Ability to control forehand groundstroke of skilled tennis players.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Mortality Fractions Attributable to Smoking and Smokeless and Mixed Tobacco Use Among Men and Women Across India, 1998-2021.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2025
Same author

How to age right and care(fully) at home? A protocol for a multistage comparative study of ageing in place and hospital at home care across three countries.

BMJ open·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

12.7K

Context-dependent neuroelectric responses during motor control.

Fabian Steinberg1, Tobias Vogt2

  • 1Institute of Physiology and Anatomy, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany; Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Albert Schweitzer Straße 22, 55099 Mainz, Germany.

Behavioural Brain Research
|December 27, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method to measure brain activity and movement during grasping tasks in both lab and real-world settings. Findings show brain responses differ significantly between contexts, suggesting lab results may not apply to everyday life.

Keywords:
AttentionCognitionEEGGraspingN200P300

More Related Videos

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

2.1K
Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

12.7K
Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

2.1K
Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Motor control research typically occurs in artificial lab settings.
  • Everyday movements differ from lab tasks due to motivation and lack of self-awareness.
  • Existing methods struggle to capture naturalistic motor control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel method for analyzing neuroelectric (EEG) and kinematic responses during grasping.
  • To compare brain responses in a simulated laboratory (L) versus an everyday (E) behavioral context.
  • To investigate the influence of behavioral context on motor control-related brain activity.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneously recorded electroencephalography (EEG) and kinematic data during grasping movements.
  • Implemented two distinct behavioral contexts: a typical laboratory (L) task and an everyday (E) task.
  • Ensured identical mechanical constraints and stimuli across both contexts for direct comparison.

Main Results:

  • Event-related potentials (N200, P300) showed significant differences between contexts L and E.
  • P300 amplitudes were higher in the laboratory context (L) compared to the everyday context (E).
  • N200 distribution varied, appearing at anterior sites in context E and posterior sites in context L.

Conclusions:

  • Brain responses during motor control are context-dependent, differing between laboratory and everyday settings.
  • Directly combining kinematic and electrophysiological recordings offers new insights into movement neuroscience.
  • Findings challenge the direct transferability of laboratory-based motor control research to real-world behavior.