Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
Published on: March 19, 2014
Modulation of corticospinal excitability by reward depends on task framing
Eric Mooshagian1, Aysha Keisler1, Trelawny Zimmermann1
1Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 10 CENTER DR, MSC 1440, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440, USA; Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
The primary motor cortex (M1) shows increased excitability with higher reward probability when seeking a target, but not when avoiding one. This motor cortex response reflects reward probability, not outcome uncertainty.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Motor Control
Background:
- Previous transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies indicate primary motor cortex (M1) sensitivity to environmental reward.
- The precise influence of reward conditions on M1 activity remains unclear.
- Dopamine neuron responses encode reward probability and outcome uncertainty, crucial for decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how reward probability and uncertainty independently modulate corticospinal excitability in M1.
- To determine if M1 activity reflects reward probability or outcome uncertainty.
- To examine the effect of task framing (seeking vs. avoiding) on M1 response to reward.
Main Methods:
- Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure corticospinal excitability via motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude.
- Participants (n=40) performed a computer task involving choices with varying reward probabilities and uncertainty levels.
- Paired-pulse TMS was administered to a subset to assess short-intracortical inhibition (SICI).
Main Results:
- Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude increased with rising reward probability specifically when participants were instructed to "find" a target.
- No significant effect of reward uncertainty on MEP amplitude was observed.
- Response times were influenced by the number of choices presented in the task.
Conclusions:
- M1 modulation by reward is primarily driven by reward probability or perceived utility, not outcome uncertainty.
- The conceptual framing of a task (seeking vs. avoiding) significantly alters M1's response to reward probability.
- Short-intracortical inhibition (SICI) did not appear to be modulated by the task conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
The theory differentiates between...

