Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026
06:51
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
9.0K
Preschoolers perform more informative experiments after observing theory-violating evidence
Tessa J P van Schijndel1, Ingmar Visser1, Bianca M C W van Bers1
1Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
|December 30, 2014
Summary
Preschoolers flexibly adjusted their play experiments when encountering conflicting evidence about shadow size. However, their investigations focused on core aspects of their initial theories, showing content-specific inflexibility.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Development
- Child Psychology
- Naive Theory Exploration
Background:
- Preschoolers possess naive theories influencing their understanding of the world.
- Exploring the impact of conflicting evidence on children's learning is crucial for developmental psychology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how preschoolers' free exploratory play is affected by evidence that contradicts their naive theories.
- To examine the flexibility and focus of children's experimental investigations in response to conflicting information.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the domain of shadow size, a complex and ecologically valid area for assessing knowledge.
- Observed and analyzed the patterns of free exploratory play and experimental actions of preschoolers exposed to conflicting versus confirming evidence.
Main Results:
- Children exposed to conflicting evidence initiated unconfounded informative experiments more frequently than those seeing confirming evidence.
- Experiments primarily targeted core dimensions of children's initial naive theories.
- Preschoolers demonstrated flexibility in the types of experiments conducted but less flexibility in the specific content investigated.
Conclusions:
- Preschoolers adapt their exploratory strategies when faced with contradictory evidence.
- Cognitive flexibility in children's learning is evident in experimental design but constrained by pre-existing theoretical frameworks.
Related Concept Videos
01:12Observational Learning
1.4K
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
1.4K
02:30Naturalistic Observations
18.2K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
18.2K
01:28Behaviorism
8.3K
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
8.3K
02:40The Scientific Method
67.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.5K
01:32The Scientific Method
275.9K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
275.9K
03:50The Scientific Method
72.6K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
72.6K