On the definition of a confounder
Tyler J VanderWeele1, Ilya Shpitser2
1Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 tvanderw@hsph.harvard.edu ;
Summary
Researchers propose a formal definition for "confounder" in causal inference, distinguishing it from "confounding." A confounder is defined as a covariate that, with others, fully eliminates confounding bias, unlike "surrogate confounders" that only reduce it.
Area of Science:
- Causal Inference
- Epidemiology
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- The field of causal inference formally defines confounding using counterfactual independence.
- However, a clear, formal definition for a
Purpose of the Study:
- To formally define a
Main Methods:
- Evaluating candidate definitions of confounders based on informal statements in the literature.
- Assessing whether controlling for all identified confounders adequately controls for confounding.
- Determining if confounders, in certain contexts, help eliminate or reduce confounding bias.
Main Results:
- Several proposed definitions failed to satisfy the key properties of controlling for confounding and reducing bias.
- One candidate definition emerged as satisfying both critical properties.
Conclusions:
- A formal definition for a confounder is proposed: a pre-exposure covariate C, which, with a set of covariates X, makes the exposure-outcome effect unconfounded conditional on (X, C), but not for any proper subset.
- Variables that reduce but do not eliminate bias are termed "surrogate confounders."
Related Concept Videos
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
580
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
580
Confirmation Biases
8.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.6K
Cause and Effect
12.7K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.7K
Cognitive Dissonance
38.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
38.1K
Deindividuation
31.3K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
31.3K


