Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Psychiatric morbidity and survival after surgery for esophageal cancer: a population-based cohort study
Anna Wikman1, Rickard Ljung2, Asif Johar2
1All authors, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; and Jesper Lagergren, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. anna.wikman@ki.se.
Purpose:
To determine the cumulative incidence of and risk factors for psychiatric morbidity and establish the impact on survival among surgically treated patients with esophageal cancer.
Patients And Methods:
A nationwide Swedish cohort of 1,615 patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer between 1987 and 2010 with follow-up until 2012 was linked to national health registries for information on psychiatric morbidity (inferred from mental health care use). Multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine potential risk factors for postoperative psychiatric morbidity. A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze overall survival.
Results:
In patients without a history of psychiatric morbidity, the 2-year cumulative incidence for treatment in psychiatric in-patient care was 2.5%, for psychiatric out-patient care was 4.2%, and for treatment with psychotropic drugs was 32.3%. Married patients were less likely to be treated postoperatively in psychiatric in-patient care (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.80) or out-patient care (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17 to 1.02), whereas patients with higher tumor stage were more likely to be treated in psychiatric out-patient care (OR, 4.99; 95% CI, 1.16 to 21.38) or with psychotropic drugs (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.10 to 7.01). Bearing in mind possible residual confounding, new-onset psychiatric morbidity was associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65 [95% CI, 1.17 to 2.33] for treatment in psychiatric in-patient care; HR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.18 to 3.16] for treatment in psychiatric out-patient care; and HR, 2.77 [95% CI, 1.72 to 4.44] for treatment with psychotropic drugs).
Conclusion:
These results highlight the importance of recognizing and addressing psychiatric morbidity in surgically treated patients with esophageal cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Cancer Survival Analysis
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
