Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Evaluating measurement error in readings of blood pressure for adolescents and young adults
Shawn Bauldry1, Kenneth A Bollen, Linda S Adair
1University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama , USA.
Insights
Combining multiple blood pressure readings requires careful consideration. Averaging readings offers high validity, outperforming complex methods for adolescents and young adults in the Philippines.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Health Sciences
Background:
- Blood pressure readings are prone to measurement error.
- Optimal methods for combining multiple readings are not well-established.
- Understanding measurement error is crucial for accurate health assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess sources of measurement error in blood pressure readings.
- To evaluate methods for combining multiple blood pressure readings.
- To examine measurement patterns across sex and time in adolescents/young adults.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Cebu National Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Study.
- Collected three sets of blood pressure readings over 2-year intervals for 2127 participants.
- Employed Multi-trait, Multi-method (MTMM) structural equation models to decompose measurement error.
Main Results:
- Identified differences in blood pressure measurement properties by sex and over time.
- Demonstrated that measurement error can be decomposed into systematic and random components.
- Found that averaging blood pressure readings showed high validity.
Conclusions:
- Combining multiple blood pressure readings should be tailored based on sex and time.
- The simple average of blood pressure readings is a valid and effective method.
- This finding has implications for accurate longitudinal health monitoring and epidemiological studies.
Abstract:
Readings of blood pressure are known to be subject to measurement error, but the optimal method for combining multiple readings is unknown. This study assesses different sources of measurement error in blood pressure readings and assesses methods for combining multiple readings using data from a sample of adolescents/young adults who were part of a longitudinal epidemiological study based in Cebu, Philippines. Three sets of blood pressure readings were collected at 2-year intervals for 2127 adolescents and young adults as part of the Cebu National Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Study. Multi-trait, multi-method (MTMM) structural equation models in different groups were used to decompose measurement error in the blood pressure readings into systematic and random components and to examine patterns in the measurement across males and females and over time. The results reveal differences in the measurement properties of blood pressure readings by sex and over time that suggest the combination of multiple readings should be handled separately for these groups at different time points. The results indicate that an average (mean) of the blood pressure readings has high validity relative to a more complicated factor-score-based linear combination of the readings.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

