Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Force Microscopy01:08

Atomic Force Microscopy

4.8K
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a type of scanning probe microscopy that can analyze topographic details of various specimens like ceramics, glass, polymers, and biological samples. AFM offers over 1000 times more resolution than the optical imaging system. Images generated from AFM are three-dimensional surface profiles, offering an advantage over the flat, two-dimensional images from other imaging techniques.
The AFM Probe
The probe is regarded as the heart of any AFM setup and comprises the...
4.8K
Elastic Strain Energy for Shearing Stresses01:20

Elastic Strain Energy for Shearing Stresses

634
As discussed in previous lessons, strain energy in a material is the energy stored when it is elastically deformed, a concept crucial in materials science and mechanical engineering. This energy results from the internal work done against the cohesive forces within the material. When a material undergoes shearing stress and corresponding shearing strain, the strain energy density, which is the energy stored per unit volume, is calculated. Within the elastic limit, where the stress is...
634

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Probe assisted localized doping of aluminum into silicon substrates.

Journal of applied physics·2024
Same author

Cell Membrane Oscillations under Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Modulation.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2023
Same author

Frequency-dependent nanomechanical profiling for medical diagnosis.

Beilstein journal of nanotechnology·2022
Same author

Optimizing the accuracy of viscoelastic characterization with AFM force-distance experiments in the time and frequency domains.

Soft matter·2022
Same author

Viscoelastic parameterization of human skin cells characterize material behavior at multiple timescales.

Communications biology·2022
Same author

Corrosion Resistance of Sulfur-Selenium Alloy Coatings.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid
08:58

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid

Published on: December 2, 2022

4.0K

Modeling viscoelasticity through spring-dashpot models in intermittent-contact atomic force microscopy.

Enrique A López-Guerra1, Santiago D Solares1

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States; Current Address: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, United States.

Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
|January 1, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study compares various models for simulating viscoelasticity in atomic force microscopy (AFM), from simple to complex nonlinear systems. The findings help select appropriate models for analyzing viscoelastic surface properties in AFM simulations.

Keywords:
atomic force microscopycreepdissipated energymultifrequencystress relaxationtapping modeviscoelasticity

More Related Videos

Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Living Cells Using Atomic Force Microscopy
08:41

Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Living Cells Using Atomic Force Microscopy

Published on: June 27, 2013

41.6K
Characterizing Multiscale Mechanical Properties of Brain Tissue Using Atomic Force Microscopy, Impact Indentation, and Rheometry
11:19

Characterizing Multiscale Mechanical Properties of Brain Tissue Using Atomic Force Microscopy, Impact Indentation, and Rheometry

Published on: September 6, 2016

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid
08:58

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid

Published on: December 2, 2022

4.0K
Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Living Cells Using Atomic Force Microscopy
08:41

Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Living Cells Using Atomic Force Microscopy

Published on: June 27, 2013

41.6K
Characterizing Multiscale Mechanical Properties of Brain Tissue Using Atomic Force Microscopy, Impact Indentation, and Rheometry
11:19

Characterizing Multiscale Mechanical Properties of Brain Tissue Using Atomic Force Microscopy, Impact Indentation, and Rheometry

Published on: September 6, 2016

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Surface Science
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a powerful tool for probing material properties at the nanoscale.
  • Understanding viscoelasticity is crucial for accurate AFM simulations of soft and biological materials.
  • Existing models for viscoelasticity in AFM simulations vary in complexity and applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate different viscoelastic models for AFM simulations.
  • To compare the performance of linear and nonlinear viscoelastic models.
  • To identify suitable models for reproducing key viscoelastic phenomena like creep and stress relaxation.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation of tip-sample interactions using various viscoelastic models, from simple spring-dashpot to complex nonlinear systems.
  • Analysis of model behavior through force-distance curves and dissipated energy.
  • Evaluation of model-specific artifacts and limitations.

Main Results:

  • Demonstration of how different models capture fundamental viscoelastic properties such as creep and stress relaxation.
  • Identification of model-specific behaviors and potential unphysical artifacts.
  • Comparison of model performance in single-eigenmode tip-sample impact scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a comparative analysis to guide the selection of appropriate viscoelastic models for AFM simulations.
  • The findings are relevant for improving the accuracy of AFM-based material characterization.
  • The evaluated models and results offer a foundation for further studies, including multifrequency AFM applications.