Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Outcomes of nonpledgeted horizontal mattress suture technique for mitral valve replacement
Gun Jik Kim1, Jong Tae Lee1, Young Ok Lee1
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital.
Background:
Most surgeons favor the pledgeted suture technique for heart valve replacements because they believe it decreases the risk of paravalvular leak (PVL). We hypothesized that the use of nonpledgeted rather than pledgeted sutures during mitral valve replacement (MVR) may decrease the incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and risk of a major PVL.
Methods:
We analyzed 263 patients, divided into 175 patients who underwent MVR with nonpledgeted sutures from January 2003 to December 2013 and 88 patients who underwent MVR with pledgeted sutures from January 1995 to December 2001. We compared the occurrence of PVL and PVE between these groups.
Results:
In patients who underwent MVR with or without tricuspid valve surgery and/or a Maze operation, PVL occurred in 1.1% of the pledgeted group and 2.9% of the nonpledgeted group. The incidence of PVE was 2.9% in the nonpledgeted group and 1.1% in the pledgeted group. No differences were statistically significant.
Conclusion:
We suggest that a nonpledgeted suture technique can be an alternative to the traditional use of pledgeted sutures in most patients who undergo MVR, with no significant difference in the incidence of PVL.
Insights
Nonpledgeted sutures in mitral valve replacement (MVR) do not increase paravalvular leak (PVL) risk. This study suggests nonpledgeted sutures are a safe alternative to pledgeted sutures for MVR, with similar outcomes for PVL and prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE).
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Surgical Techniques
- Prosthetic Valve Implantation
Background:
- Surgeons often prefer pledgeted sutures for heart valve replacement, believing they reduce paravalvular leak (PVL).
- The potential impact of nonpledgeted sutures on prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and major PVL risk in mitral valve replacement (MVR) is less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether nonpledgeted sutures in mitral valve replacement (MVR) are associated with a decreased incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and risk of major paravalvular leak (PVL).
- To compare the outcomes of MVR using nonpledgeted versus pledgeted sutures.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 263 patients undergoing MVR.
- Comparison of outcomes between 175 patients who received nonpledgeted sutures (2003-2013) and 88 patients who received pledgeted sutures (1995-2001).
- Evaluation of the occurrence of PVL and PVE in both groups.
Main Results:
- Paravalvular leak (PVL) occurred in 2.9% of the nonpledgeted group and 1.1% of the pledgeted group.
- Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) incidence was 2.9% in the nonpledgeted group and 1.1% in the pledgeted group.
- No statistically significant differences in PVL or PVE rates were observed between the two suture techniques.
Conclusions:
- Nonpledgeted suture technique can serve as a viable alternative to pledgeted sutures in the majority of mitral valve replacement (MVR) procedures.
- The use of nonpledgeted sutures in MVR does not lead to a significant increase in the incidence of paravalvular leak (PVL).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction

