Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
Dose reconstruction for the million worker study: status and guidelines
André Bouville1, Richard E Toohey, John D Boice
1*National Cancer Institute (retired), 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7E590, MSC 9778, Rockville, MD 20850; †M. H. Chew & Associates, Oak Ridge, TN; ‡National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD; §U.S. Department of Energy (retired), New York, NY; **Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; ††Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN; ‡‡Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN; §§International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD; ***Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA; †††Clarksburg, MD; ‡‡‡U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC; §§§University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; ****U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Arlington, TX; ††††Risk Assessment Corporation, Neeses, SC; ‡‡‡‡Landauer, Inc., Glenwood, IL; §§§§Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO.
Abstract:
The primary aim of the epidemiologic study of one million U.S. radiation workers and veterans [the Million Worker Study (MWS)] is to provide scientifically valid information on the level of radiation risk when exposures are received gradually over time and not within seconds, as was the case for Japanese atomic bomb survivors. The primary outcome of the epidemiologic study is cancer mortality, but other causes of death such as cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease will be evaluated. The success of the study is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide realistic estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses that are as accurate and precise as possible and to properly evaluate their accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the MWS are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 y. The dosimetric issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, U.S. Department of Energy workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma- or x-ray sources, for some of the study groups, there is a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that requires internal radiation dosimetry assessments. Scientific Committee 6-9 has been established by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) to produce a report on the comprehensive organ dose assessment (including uncertainty analysis) for the MWS. The NCRP dosimetry report will cover the specifics of practical dose reconstruction for the ongoing epidemiologic studies with uncertainty analysis discussions and will be a specific application of the guidance provided in NCRP Report Nos. 158, 163, 164, and 171. The main role of the Committee is to provide guidelines to the various groups of dosimetrists involved in the MWS to ensure that certain dosimetry criteria are considered: calculation of annual absorbed doses in the organs of interest, separation of low and high linear-energy transfer components, evaluation of uncertainties, and quality assurance and quality control. It is recognized that the MWS and its approaches to dosimetry are a work in progress and that there will be flexibility and changes in direction as new information is obtained with regard to both dosimetry and the epidemiologic features of the study components. This paper focuses on the description of the various components of the MWS, the available dosimetry results, and the challenges that have been encountered. It is expected that the Committee will complete its report in 2016.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
07:31Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies